Blueredge
Welcome!
editHello, Blueredge, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Getting Started
- Introduction to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome! BusterD (talk) 06:03, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
January 2014
editHello, I'm BusterD. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Airborne early warning and control seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. BusterD (talk) 06:04, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Do not remove cited description
edit- Clearly you don't understand anything about the topic, other than a desire to add Boeing propaganda. What is there isn't original research, just uncited as yet. The claim that Boeings AWACS system is "world's standard" is nothing but Boeing PR, and wikipedia is not a repository of corporate bs. - and you are now in violation of the 3 revert rule.NiD.29 (talk) 06:09, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
- OK. But your claim that "AWACS is older term of AEW&C" is not cited at all, and not only me but also some person have a doubt about that description.Is that your original reserch?--Blueredge (talk) 06:15, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
- Clearly you don't understand anything about the topic, other than a desire to add Boeing propaganda. What is there isn't original research, just uncited as yet. The claim that Boeings AWACS system is "world's standard" is nothing but Boeing PR, and wikipedia is not a repository of corporate bs. - and you are now in violation of the 3 revert rule.NiD.29 (talk) 06:09, 2 January 2014 (UTC)
Blueredge, you are invited to the Teahouse
editHi Blueredge! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |