User talk:BobJKus

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

Your draft shows signs of having been generated by a large language model, such as ChatGPT. Wikipedia guidelines prohibit the use of LLMs to write articles from scratch. In addition, LLM-generated articles usually have multiple quality issues, to include:

• Promotional tone, editorializing and other words to watch
• Vague, generic, and speculative statements extrapolated from similar subjects
• Essay-like writing
• Hallucinations (plausible-sounding, but false information) and non-existent references
• Close paraphrasing
  

Please address these issues. The best way is usually to read reliable sources and summarize them, instead of using a large language model. See our help page on large language models.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This is just AI-generated slop?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:BobJKus/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

qcne (talk) 11:04, 19 December 2025 (UTC)

Hello, BobJKus! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! qcne (talk) 11:04, 19 December 2025 (UTC)

Hi @BobJKus. I saw your message in the #wikipedia-en-help channel.

Unfortunately ChatGPT did more than improve the language and grammar of the draft. Entire sentences and paragraphs are pure inappropriate ChatGPT output. We do not permit this on Wikipedia.

Please do not use an AI chatbot to write for Wikipedia.

If you want to try again with the draft, you will need to re-write almost the entire thing: start from scratch. Only summarise what secondary sources state, in a strictly neutral way.

I will highlight some of the slop ChatGPT outputted:

he witnessed firsthand the devastating effects of the disease on schoolchildren and villagers. Deeply moved by what he saw, he committed himself to understanding the biology of the parasite

He was known as an exceptional mentor, fostering open discussion and valuing diverse viewpoints. Even in retirement, John remained deeply committed to education, encouraging adult learners and mentoring students returning to academia later in life.

John had a rare gift for communicating complex ideas to wide audiences. In 2022, he published an article in The Conversation[4] explaining how lipid membranes influence viral and parasitic infections, using COVID-19 and schistosomiasis as key examples. In The Great Discovery (2023), John reflected on his personal path—from a sceptical young scientist to a man of deep Christian conviction—intertwining science, memory, and meaning. Drawing from his experiences in Sudan and Brazil, he explored how observation, wonder, and ethical responsibility shaped his dual commitments to science and faith

John's spiritual awakening occurred gradually through his cross-cultural experiences and his wife Marion's influence. He became an elder and long-serving Session Clerk at Kildrum Parish Church, where he was known for his quiet strength, scriptural insight, and pastoral care. He believed that scientific inquiry and religious faith both demanded humility, curiosity, and a commitment to truth.

He was a devoted family man with a love for hillwalking, marathon running, music, and books. His personal warmth and humour were legendary; stories of his lab pranks, including a faux call from “Mr G. Raff” at Edinburgh Zoo, reflected his light-hearted nature and ability to connect with others.

But perhaps his greatest legacy lay in his influence as a teacher, his pursuit of ethical science, and his belief in the harmony of faith and reason.

His life remains a testament to curiosity, compassion, and the pursuit of understanding—both scientific and spiritual.

As you can see then, the majority of your draft is AI generated slop. qcne (talk) 17:52, 19 December 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your feedback, I’ll rewrite and resubmit next month. Have a great festive season. Rob ~2025-41860-16 (talk) 09:47, 20 December 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding User:BobJKus/sandbox

Hello, BobJKus. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:BobJKus/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:07, 21 May 2026 (UTC)

Your draft article, User:BobJKus/sandbox

Hello, BobJKus. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "sandbox".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply , and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! ~ŤheŴubṂachine-840≈ ● ✒️ 14:10, 19 June 2026 (UTC)