Boba Fett TBH
Not scholarly?
editChomsky's work does not count as scholarly? Are you serious? I mean, I'm sure you do not share this opinion, but I don't understand it. On what possible basis do people raise such objections? Also, I can't use his source, since it's primary. LudicrousTripe (talk) 10:54, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
I use primary sources all the time. Im just saying you should cover all your bases so your work doesn't get deleted by certain users looking for a reason.--Boba Fett TBH (talk) 11:10, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
- Roger that. LudicrousTripe (talk) 13:27, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
Blocked
edit{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Nick-D (talk) 08:15, 17 September 2013 (UTC)Nick-D (talk) 08:15, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
What? I received a message about this on your talk page earlier:
Hello Nick-D, I am highly certain, that editor Boba Fett TBH, currently editing on Contras, 2002 Venezuelan coup d'état attempt, Vietnam war pages and others, is a Sock-puppet of Horhey420. What do think? Regards, Stumink (talk) 13:42, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
- Hi Stumink, I've been through that editor's contributions and compared them to Horhey's, and I agree that it's clearly him. I have blocked the account, and thank you for raising this. Per the usual procedures all of their edits can and should be reverted. Regards, Nick-D (talk) 08:14, 17 September 2013 (UTC)