Bobble head

Welcome!

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, Bobble head, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! —Paleo Neonate – 03:29, 15 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

WP:BRD, WP:PSCI

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Please note that when other editors revert your changes, per WP:BRD you should open a discussion on the relevant artice's talk page and reach consensus (WP:CONSENSUS) instead of reinstating those edits. On Wikipedia we also have clear policies about representing pseudoscience clearly (WP:PSCI). I have left a welcome message above which includes links on how Wikipedia works. Thanks, —Paleo Neonate – 03:29, 15 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

FYI

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article Gusty Spence, along with other articles relating to The Troubles, is currently subject to active arbitration remedies, as laid out during a 2007 Arbitration case, and amended by community consensus in 2008, 2009, and 2012. The current restrictions are:

All editors on Troubles-related articles are directed to get the advice of neutral parties via means such as outside opinions.
All articles related to The Troubles, defined as: any article that could be reasonably construed as being related to The Troubles, Irish nationalism, and British nationalism in relation to Ireland falls under WP:1RR (one revert per editor per article per 24 hour period). When in doubt, assume it is related.
- Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Reverts of edits made by anonymous IP editors that are not vandalism are exempt from 1RR but are subject to the usual rules on edit warring.
Editors who violate this 1RR restriction may be blocked without warning by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.
Editors may be subject to discretionary sanctions.

If you are a new editor, or an editor unfamiliar with the situation, please follow the above guidelines. If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. You may also wish to review the arbitration case page. When in doubt, don't revert!

— Jon C.^ॐ 12:44, 15 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic