User talk:Bocanegris

MfD nomination of User:Bocanegris

User:Bocanegris, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Bocanegris and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Bocanegris during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Jasper Deng (talk) 20:10, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

March 2026

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war, according to the reverts you've made to Banksy. This means that you are repeatedly reverting content back to how you think it should be, despite knowing that other editors disagree. Once it is known that there is a disagreement, users are expected to collaborate with others, avoid editing disruptively, and try to reach a consensus – rather than repeatedly reverting the changes made by other users.

Important points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive behavior – regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not engage in edit warring – even if you believe that you are right.

You need to discuss the disagreement on the article's talk page and work towards a revision that represents consensus among everyone involved. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution if discussions reach an impasse. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to engage in edit warring, you may be blocked from editing.

Please note that WP:BLP policy is unambiguous: The burden of evidence rests with the editor who adds or restores the material. See also the sections WP:BLPREMOVE and WP:BLPRESTORE. Generalrelative (talk) 22:12, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to living or recently deceased subjects of biographical content on Wikipedia articles, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia's norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Generalrelative (talk) 22:13, 17 March 2026 (UTC)

RfC process

You may wish to review the guidance on requests for comment prior to initiating any more. Specifically, you should review the requirements for RfC questions to be neutrally phrased. While the initiator of an RfC may of course argue for their preferred position, this should happen as one comment on the RfC, not in the RfC statement. That statement should be brief and neutrally phrased, e.g., "Should article X include Y?". Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 09:10, 6 April 2026 (UTC)