BonniePrinceCharlie

Your edits to Talk:Penis

It is extremely rare for comments to be removed from a talk page, but the comment about Americans was removed from Talk:Penis as it was off topic. The talk page should be used only for discussions about improving the article.--Ianmacm 23:05, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Your edit to Talk:Target Corporation

Remember that article talk pages are provided to coordinate the article's improvement, not for engaging in discussion for discussion's sake. Do not use them as a discussion forum.

I have removed your edit to Talk:Target Corporation because it is off-topic and can be considered offensive to people. Tuxide 00:31, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

You might want to let everyone else in the world know that too, then.

Off-topic messages and personal attacks

Your posts in Talk:Chandra Levy were removed because they were unrelated to the goal of improving the article, and the second one was a personal attack. Wikipedia civility policy requires better behavior of editors; please observe it in future. --Dhartung | Talk 20:26, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Is there any policy about being a whining sophist?

WP:AGF

Please assume good faith when dealing with other editors. See Wikipedia:Assume good faith for the guidelines on this. ST47Talk 21:10, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Do I also just have to assume what you're talking about?

Your obtuse comment on the user's talk page about the signature bot. ST47Talk 00:45, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Obtuse comment? Personal attacks violate wikipedia policy, you fucking shithead. BonniePrinceCharlie 00:48, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Calling someone a fucking shithead is a personal attack. Stop immediately. Yuser31415 19:46, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Irony! Right over your head! I don't tolerate intolerance.

I'm not going to rise to your level. Stop disrupting Wikipedia before you get banned. Yuser31415 (Review me!) 01:25, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point. Veinor (ヴエノル^(talk)) 22:09, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Heh. Not going to rise to his level, eh? Awesome. Can't make this up. 72.144.103.202 00:57, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Ok, this is still funny. "I'm not going to rise to your level." is just classic. I mean, of course you won't rise there. You'll stay far below it. LOLLERSKATES 72.144.71.193 05:00, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

This continues to be funny. I wonder if that guy ever rose to my level! 2601:989:4300:20B0:2D0E:3DAE:E79B:B174 (talk) 14:25, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Comments on your own talk page

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Tuxide 06:52, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

I agree, ST47 was way out of line. I tried to help him but I am sure your rather harsher means of teaching him will prevail. BonniePrinceCharlie 18:22, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

In addition, it is very important that you not modify other user's comments to make it appear as if they said something they did not. Your "I like penis" insertion above was unbecoming and immature, and could mislead other people about that other editor's behavior by making it seem as if they wrote it. I have removed the added comment; please refrain from such activity in the future. -- nae'blis 22:16, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Did you just modify a comment on a talk page and then personally attack me? Wow, my head is spinning with all the violations of wikipedia rules. You really need to learn from me to be a little more conscientious in obeying the regulations. They are here for our benefit. BonniePrinceCharlie 22:50, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

That wouldn't be entirely accurate, no (assuming you're talking to me here). I restored a comment that you had modified, and then told you what I had done. There were no personal attacks, though I did describe your behavior as unbecoming. I see from many of your other edits that you are a responsible contributor most of the time, and would prefer to see that remain the trend. -- nae'blis 23:04, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to User talk:BonniePrinceCharlie, are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. --Trunkalunk 22:28, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

You have removed several user warning templates from your user or user talk page. This is a bad idea. These warnings are not put on your talk page to annoy you; they are put here because other editors think that your behavior needs improvement, and we're giving you the courtesy of letting you know. Please respond by changing your behavior, and please stop removing the warnings. Thank you. Tuxide 04:34, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

It is not a courtesy to continue to harass me with needless bureaucratic nonsense from an apparently non-existent user. It is also not really cool with me to see that editing comments in talk pages and personally attacking users is perfectly fine, except when I do it, when it's the fucking end of the world. This truth-by-committee pile of awful is a self-parody. Have your petty dictatorship, abuse the miniscule power you have, and keep reaching for that rainbow! 04:51, 16 December 2006 (UTC)04:51, 16 December 2006 (UTC)04:51, 16 December 2006 (UTC)04:51, 16 December 2006 (UTC)04:51, 16 December 2006 (UTC)04:51, 16 December 2006 (UTC)04:51, 16 December 2006 (UTC)04:51, 16 December 2006 (UTC)04:51, 16 December 2006 (UTC)04:51, 16 December 2006 (UTC)04:51, 16 December 2006 (UTC)04:51, 16 December 2006 (UTC)04:51, 16 December 2006 (UTC)04:51, 16 December 2006 (UTC)~~

Stop

Stop vandalizing my talk page. I'll do what I have to to see you banned if you continue in this matter.

He's got a point. He's clearly seen the warnings, making him wear them here like a Scarlet Letter is not productive to resolving the dispute or making BPC any less likely to be angry. Would everyone just take a cease fire on this page and move on, please? There's no policy that he has to keep the warnings indefinitely, and it's just creating drama at this point. -- nae'blis 17:24, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

The issue is, if users remove warnings such as these that are fairly recent, then editors who aren't familiar with the user won't know that they have a history, and keep giving them level 1 templates. This would allow the user to vandalize for much longer, until someone gets wise and starts checking history. I do agree that old warnings (6 months+) should be removable, but not ones that were added in the past 2 weeks. Veinor (ヴエノル^(talk)) 19:33, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Exactly. Get the damn Commie, make him wear his shame, and humiliate him. It makes for a better experience. (knowledge sold separately) 72.144.103.202 00:55, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Stop harassing people

Stop harrassing people. This is third party intervention. One more personal attack and you will be blocked for blatant disruption. Please stop. Thank you. Yuser31415 19:45, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

I agree. The people that keep harassing BonniePrinceCharlie should stop it now, or be banned.

Hmm. You obviously misunderstand; the warning is directed at BonniePrinceCharlie. Veinor (ヴエノル^(talk)) 22:10, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Note to Veinor: I'd bet you a recent changes patrol that the IP that posted that comment was BonniePrinceCharlie, not logged in. Yuser31415 (Review me!) 01:24, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Really? So the harassment of BonniePrinceCharlie doesn't matter somehow? 72.144.103.202 00:56, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

Please don't remove warnings

You have removed several user warning templates from your user or user talk page. This is a bad idea. These warnings are not put on your talk page to annoy you; they are put here because other editors think that your behavior needs improvement, and we're giving you the courtesy of letting you know. Please respond by changing your behavior, and please stop removing the warnings. Thank you. --Brad Beattie (talk) 05:47, 27 December 2006 (UTC)

Stigma

This user should wear his fradulent reportings like a scarlet A, forever, making him feel shame that he spoke up for truth instead of dogma. Praise Wikipedia. 72.144.71.193 04:56, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

I agree. This guy is a fucking dick. 72.144.60.229 09:32, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

NPOV master

BPC is the master of POV and ought to have an award saying so. Truth? Bah! NPOV > truth. 68.84.224.36 (talk) 07:45, 17 February 2008 (UTC)