Borderbumble

Welcome to Wikipedia

Thanks for your question at the Reference Desks, here are some links which (while not answering your question) may be useful to you. DuncanHill (talk) 23:14, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

Hello, Borderbumble! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! DuncanHill (talk) 23:14, 10 December 2007 (UTC) Getting started A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

CIDP

By magical chance I am here! Yes, I listed those articles. At the time of my listing them one of them said that all but two of the people had recovered. I got one or two of the articles from Yahoo News which I have found in the past to edit reports without acknowledging the change. In general this has been due to grievous grammatical issues with the article. By all means, if you find another article that claims that no one is recovering, and if the articles I provide no longer claim that people have recovered, change / edit the story! As a matter of fact, I think stories are more interesting the more apocalyptic they sound! (although I am not religious, waiting for an actual apocalypse, or wanting people to be sick). But that's what the stories said at the time I accessed them and I tried to be NPOV.

Okay, so I found the reference, it was in the first listed article and said "Two were hospitalized for a time. Some of the workers recovered completely, while others are still going through rehabilitation, she said." I guess that in reading it quickly I took it to mean that most of the other workers except for the two in hospital recovered. Now that I see my mistake I will correct it on that page. Good luck in your work! Saudade7 04:01, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Hi again

Thought you might like this new news story...Saudade7 05:51, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

PS

And Another