Boris Kruglyak

Speedy deletion nomination of Electronic Immortality

Hello Boris Kruglyak,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Electronic Immortality for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. MrScorch6200 (talk) 02:18, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Electronic Immortality

Hello, Boris Kruglyak,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Electronic Immortality should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electronic Immortality .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Green Cardamom (talk) 06:09, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Electronic Immortality

Please do not delete article “Electronic Immortality” . This direction is the most perspective in this field. I have a small experience in WIKI and poor English. Please help me to edit and improve the article. Boris Kruglyak (talk) 00:54, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Electronic Immortality, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. IRWolfie- (talk) 21:11, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Repost of Electronic Immortality

A tag has been placed on Electronic Immortality requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. Green Cardamom (talk) 03:37, 21 October 2013 (UTC)

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Space elevator may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• 0/g_0</math> is the ratio between the centrifugal force on the equator and the gravitational force.}}(Note: The first optimal cable of Space Elevator was developed Alexander Bolonkin and reported in

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:36, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Space Elevator

I don't understand what you are trying to say with your edits to Space elevator, and by making identical edits in three different places in the article, it's clear you aren't familiar with Wikipedia conventions. Please discuss what you want to say either here on this talk page, or in the article talk page before re-instating those edits. Thank you, Tarl.Neustaedter (talk) 02:22, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

The monograph “Non Rocket Space Launch and Flight”. Elsevier, 2005. 488 pgs. ISBN-13: 978-0-08044-731-5, ISBN-10: 0-080-44731-7 .http://www.archive.org/details/Non-rocketSpaceLaunchAndFlight , http://www.scribd.com/doc/202159078/Non-Rocket-Space-Launch-and-Flight-2-nd-Edition , is the main book in this field in present time and contains the most detail information about this topics. But NO any reference in article about it. Author of article to not know the main book in this field.

I offer to include this book in “Further reading”.

But I have small experience in WIKI. Please help me. Boris Kruglyak (talk) 01:01, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

I see you've added the pointer to Bolonkin's book in the "Further Reading" section, and that looks fine. The formatting of the entry could be better, see Template:Cite, I'll probably fix it for you later this week.

The edits I removed were separate, a statement about "developed the first optimal cable", which I didn't understand. Even if you demonstrate that Bolonkin had developed an "optimal cable" (whatever that means), stating that he developed the first one would require additional citation documenting that nobody else had developed such a cable before. If you have more questions, feel free to ask them here, I'll monitor your talk page for the next several weeks.

You may find some of the links below useful. Regards, Tarl.Neustaedter (talk) 03:50, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Boris Kruglyak! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Tarl.Neustaedter (talk) 03:53, 28 January 2014 (UTC) Getting Started The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

New account?

Are you the same editor as ABA888? Did you lose your password or something? If you are the same person, please choose one account and stay with it; it is good in such cases to post to the talk page of the account you will no longer use, naming the other account. Our sockpuppet policy does not normally allow editors to use more than one account, exceptions being things like security for editors with advanced permissions when they edit from insecure internet connections, and the alternate account must always be linked to the main account. If on the other hand you are a different person who sometimes uses the same computer, the policy is here; you should declare that you are a different person. Yngvadottir (talk) 19:18, 8 February 2015 (UTC)