September 2021

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Famigo. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Don't change the subject of articles to your own - Write your own article with it's own title see Wikipedia:Articles for creation for creating a draft KylieTastic (talk) 15:11, 23 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Bossming, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Bossming! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Famigo (September 29)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CptViraj were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
CptViraj (talk) 09:13, 29 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Famigo (Arizona company) has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Famigo (Arizona company). Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:10, 3 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Famigo (Arizona company) (October 3)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 03:12, 3 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Famigo (Arizona company) (October 3)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 15:46, 3 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Famigo (Arizona company) has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Famigo (Arizona company). Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 19:41, 3 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
edit
 

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Bossming, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Bossming|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Theroadislong (talk) 07:47, 4 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Famigo (Arizona company)

edit

  Hello, Bossming. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Famigo (Arizona company), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 23 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Famigo (Arizona company)

edit
 

Hello, Bossming. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Famigo".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:42, 3 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: FAMIGO (October 17)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asparagusus was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Asparagusus (interaction) 21:59, 17 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hi @Asparagusus. Can you help me understand what in particular looks like advertisement? This is not the intent at all as we absolutely value Wikipedia's unbiased source of information and as much as I tried to follow the philosophy, seems like I need guidance and will appreciate.
As far as references, several are by top tier unbiased and non sponsored news paper articles from EL Nuevo Dia and El Nuevo Herald and I am not sure if since they are in Spanish, I hope not but I am afraid the reviewer not understanding them they might be disregarded as not as important.
I appreciate your guidance. Bossming (talk) 23:11, 17 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hello, Bossming. First, I wasn't talking about the references; per WP:NONENG, non-English sources' merit aren't based on their languages (though I don't think I could properly gauge their reliability as I don't know much Spanish). The reason I declined your draft was because the prose seemed to have a bit of a promotional tone. Here's some examples:
  • "...to help independent artists, [and] influencers monetize their content."
This sentence feels somewhat promotional because of the word "help" as well as the list of their target demographics. This could be reworded to be something like "...as a monetization platform for musicians." This, however, may not work entirely, because of the confusing wording of the rest of the sentence. Something of the like, though, would.
  • "...under the guidance of CTO Tanmay Shahane..."
I would just cut this from the text. It is an unnecessary clause on its own, and it serves only to mention the CTO. It is (in my opinion) not important to the context of the sentence.
  • "The FAMIGO web-based marketplace allows the creator to sell single digital content, subscriptions, music, podcasts, shout outs[,] and anything digital."
This sentence seems promotional because of the word "allows"; this makes it feel as if the marketplace is very generous. It also feels promotional because of the list of its features (and especially the fact that it ends with "...and anything digital", which makes it sound exactly like an ad). One way to reword the sentence (if it's kept at all) would be, "FAMIGO also has a web-based marketplace for musicians." It also needs to be cited. (If you can't find a citation, then it's probably not worth mentioning in the article.)
  • "Since launch, Famigo has welcomed creators from multiple industries such as musicians Jowell, Randy, Ivy Queen, DJ Nelson, Cultura Profetica, Essene, Leen Beat, and other industries including master chefs Colombia Leo Cocinero, models, TV celebrities Darcey & Stacey Silva, and most recently sports & wellness, welcoming The Bone Collector and Colombia's soccer team, Atletico Nacional."
First, the two uses of "welcomes/welcoming": again like "allows". Too friendly-sounding; Wikipedia articles have to follow WP:NPOV. The second complaint is my real problem with this paragraph: it's just a bunch of WP:NAMEDROPPING. A list of notable people that use the service doesn't automatically make it WP:NOTABLE.
Thank you for working to get this WP:PAID article to follow guidelines. Hopefully this analysis helps. If I have time, I might go in and help with the prose of the draft, but I've already spent quite a bit of time writing this. Have a good day/night!
Asparagusus (interaction) Asparagusus (interaction) 00:25, 18 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Bossming! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Asparagusus (interaction) 21:59, 17 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
wow, @Asparagusus, thank you so much on the feedback. I am working on the prose now. Thank you for the guidance. Bossming (talk) 16:37, 18 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
You're welcome!
Asparagusus (interaction) 16:48, 18 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Asparagusus - I finished updating the company history. Thank you for your feedback. It looks more direct and specific to what I intended to write. I just needed guidance. Please let me know your thoughts and if the prose is reasonable. Best! Bossming (talk) 18:17, 18 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
@Asparagusus - also, is it pending review? There is one declined submission and a an additional message "pending review". Bossming (talk) 18:22, 18 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Famigo (entertainment company) has been accepted

edit
 
Famigo (entertainment company), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Asparagusus (interaction) 21:00, 18 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thank you so much! I appreciate the help and guidance! Bossming (talk) 22:18, 18 October 2022 (UTC)Reply