a barnstar for you!

edit
  Women in Red Women in Oceania contest
BostonMensa Thank you for your additions November 2021 WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 01:23, 1 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

...

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, BostonMensa

Thank you for creating Camille Cogswell.

User:Bruxton, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article. Please consider expanding both the article and the lead.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bruxton}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bruxton (talk) 21:39, 30 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red

edit

Hi there, BostonMensa. I have been looking through all the biographies of women you have recently created. Although you have been tagging them with WIR banners, as far as I can see you are not yet a member of Women in Red. You can join by registering in the box at the top of the page. Keep up the good work. It's a great help in reducing the gender gap. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 09:04, 16 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Harry W. Hill (politician)

edit

Hi there. Cats are definitely not my strong point, but I don't see where any of the other cats in that article overlap Arizona politicians. What did I miss? Onel5969 TT me 16:26, 21 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

the category Arizona state senators means by definition they are an Arizona politician. BostonMensa (talk) 16:48, 21 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. But I don't think that's what duplication of cats means. My understanding is that for that to be true, Arizona politicians would be a sub-category of Arizona State Senators, which it is not. The only reason I bring this up, is that I was not adding the AZ pol cat to my articles, but another editor, who does extensive cat work, began to add it to all my articles. Onel5969 TT me 21:19, 21 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
I don’t remember if I said duplicate or redundant. To me it is no different than putting a series of categories for Mayor Of Boston, Mayors in Eastern Massachusetts, Mayors In Massachusetts, Mayors in Southern New England, Mayors in the NE US, Mayors in the US, Mayors in North America, Mayors in the Western Hemisphere all the way up to Mayora in the Milky Way. At some point you say enough is enough. BostonMensa (talk) 23:30, 21 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for getting back to me. After I left my message above, I asked a question over on the Cat project page. We are both right.  . But in the end, AZ State Senators is a Subcat subcat subcat subcat of Arizona politicians. So I'll no longer add it. Thanks again. Onel5969 TT me 23:44, 21 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
Mo problem. I see it as a learning opportunity to ask questions like this. BostonMensa (talk) 00
32, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Talk pages

edit

Hi there, I wanted to let you know you don't need to add your signature if just adding a WikiProject banner to talk pages, like at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ashley_Merriman&oldid=1118788321. Keep up the good work overall though! -Kj cheetham (talk) 11:08, 29 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

I don’t. It has been added automatically for so,e time now! BostonMensa (talk) 12:29, 29 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
Ah! It's no harm, so probably not worth digging into. :) Must be some automated script somewhere! -Kj cheetham (talk) 12:39, 29 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
That is what I think. And it would be a nuisance to erase it each time. It doesn’t hurt anyone by being there. BostonMensa (talk) 12:41, 29 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Writer's Barnstar
For creating biographical articles for women. Kj cheetham (talk) 15:32, 6 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Gary Sullivan (restaurateur) moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Gary Sullivan (restaurateur), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 18:51, 9 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

December 2022

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "BostonMensa", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it seems to be the name of an organization. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing the form at Special:GlobalRenameRequest, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 19:54, 10 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hawaiian Airlines Flight 35

edit

WP:NOTNEWS means that yes, the article is about something in the news, but no, enwiki is not a newspaper, and things which are in the news but are unlikely to have WP:SUSTAINED coverage shouldn't have an article anyway. Having 3, 4, 5 news articles as sources doesn't invalidate a NOTNEWS deletion. Fram (talk) 21:17, 20 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

I looked at the link provided and chose my words based on what it said there. I was making a distinction between an airline crash that received that kind of coverage versus an automobile accident with, at worse minor injuries to maybe two people and which is not wiki worthy. This article may or not be as well but I saw it being newsworthy based on the criteria I saw there. Take it to AFD since the prod was contested. I will not argue with the consensus. BostonMensa (talk) 21:34, 20 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Bottom line, you cited the not news link. I haven’t looked at the sustained link but if it says what I think it does, and you had cited that, I would have left the prod. I simply didn’t agree with your argument. BostonMensa (talk) 21:37, 20 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Merry Christmas!

edit
  Merry Christmas, BostonMensa

Or Season's Greetings or Happy Winter Solstice!
As the year winds to a close, I would like to take a moment to
recognize your hard work and offer heartfelt gratitude for all you do for Wikipedia.
May this Holiday Season bring you and yours nothing but joy, health and prosperity.
Onel5969 TT me 20:07, 20 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

edit

  Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Rialto (restaurant). Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:12, 31 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

A kitten for you!

edit
 

Thanks for your work on Jennifer May Loten.

✠ Rejoy2003 ✠ (contact) 04:12, 1 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red

edit

Hi there, BostonMensa, and welcome to Women in Red. I've been looking through the articles you have created and am impressed by the large number of usually short but informative biographies of women, often in relation to restaurants or diplomacy. Your work has certainly helped to improve our statistics and now that you are a member of the project, I'm sure we can look forward to many, many more. If you haven't already done so, you might find it useful to look through our Essays, especially our Primer. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. All the best for 2023 and happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 07:46, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red January 2023

edit
 
 
Happy New Year from Women in Red | January 2023, Volume 9, Issue 1, Nos 250, 251, 252, 253, 254


Online events:

See also:

Tip of the month:

  • De-orphan and incorporate an article into Wikipedia using the Find Link tool

Other ways to participate:

  Facebook |   Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter

--Ipigott (talk) 07:46, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Deletion discussion about Osnat Lubrani

edit

Hello, BostonMensa, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Shushugah, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Osnat Lubrani, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Osnat Lubrani.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Shushugah}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

~ 🦝 Shushugah (he/him • talk) 02:39, 7 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Not sure how the UN profile page of a UN EMPLOYEE MAKES IT am independent source but whatever. BostonMensa (talk) 02:51, 7 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, BostonMensa. Thank you for your work on Jimmy's Harborside Restaurant. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:10, 12 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, BostonMensa. Thank you for your work on Sister Mary Paul Janchill. User:Netherzone, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating this article on this fascinating woman. Please consider expanding it for our readers.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Netherzone}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Netherzone (talk) 01:56, 18 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

David Ladner moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, David Ladner, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. Right now it only has one, and that one is iffy (Inside Hook). The Long Island Restaurant News is a press release, and the other two are brief mentions of him. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Or ping me and I'll have another look.Onel5969 TT me 14:48, 19 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

January 2023

edit

  An article you recently created, Jackson Hole Burgers, is not suitable as written to remain published. An article needs more information and citations from reliable, independent sources to remain in the mainspace. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline, has suitable content and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Thanks. There is minimal coverage regarding the restaurant itself, rather mostly notable people who have visited it. Per WP:INHERITORG, businesses do not directly inherit notability from people who have visited them. Silikonz💬 19:37, 27 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Helena Sångeland for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Helena Sångeland, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Helena Sångeland until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:01, 18 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gary Sullivan (restaurateur) (February 20)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
S0091 (talk) 18:25, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Eva Weigold Schultz moved to draftspace

edit

Unfortunately, an article you recently created Eva Weigold Schultz, is not ready as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage with citations from reliable and independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. I've moved your article to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's WP:GNG guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 08:51, 7 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Ian McCary moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Ian McCary, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe, and currently does not have any. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 14:34, 11 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Apparent violation of username policy

edit

Hi, I only just noticed your username, BostonMensa, because something you wrote popped up on my watchlist. As has been previously explained to you by User:331dot, a username which appears to stand for an organization and not for a unique person is impermissible according to our WP:Username policy. You didn't respond in December when invited to give your opinion about whether you believe that you username is not a violation of policy, but you really should do so now. If you have any questions about our username policy, or about anything else, feel free to {{Reply}} Mathglot (talk) 04:48, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Butter Restaurant

edit

Hello BostonMensa,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Butter Restaurant for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 06:52, 26 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

reason for proposed deletion of Ajura tag resolved

edit

Good day friend BostonMensa i noticed you placed A proposed deletion of Ajura tag on Ajura just wanted to let you know that all the unreliable sources citations has been replaced with reliable sources that meets with Wikipedia:WikiProject Nigeria/Nigerian sources standards of citations from reliable sources. thanks for the tag and for constantly helping the community grow Digitalageohio (talk) 11:53, 4 May 2023 (UTC)Reply


It was proposed for deletion because it had NO references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BostonMensa (talkcontribs) 12:00, 4 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
BostonMensa, please remember to sign your posts using four tildes. (~~~~) Otherwise, Wikimedia's built-in Reply Tool will sign your posts automatically. Jalen Folf (talk) 18:54, 4 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Jeff Nace

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jeff Nace requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Mccapra (talk) 04:05, 5 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

proposed deletion of Ajura tag resolved

edit

Good day friend BostonMensa now that Ajura references has been added that match up with wikipedia standards Glad it has been removed from the Proposed deletion category and thank you again. Digitalageohio (talk) 11:37, 5 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Martin “Ed” Ragain

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Martin “Ed” Ragain, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Fram (talk) 15:02, 12 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

May 2023

edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Fram (talk) 15:08, 12 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

It looks as if you created the Ragain page by a copy-paste move, instead of simply moving the original page (with its history) to the correct title. In this case, nothing needs to be done as it was a terrible page to start with and didn't belong on enwiki anyway, but in the future please move the page instead of creating a new page by copying the text. Fram (talk) 15:10, 12 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Carrie Barnett moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Carrie Barnett, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 11:24, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Gündoğdu Üstün moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Gündoğdu Üstün, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG. Recent AfD consensus is that ambassadors do not have automatic notability.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 TT me 13:00, 26 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of *Kandiss Taylor

edit
 

The article *Kandiss Taylor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

She's not notable per GNG or NPOL. Page should be created at Kandiss Taylor if she ever becomes notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Muboshgu (talk) 22:48, 27 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red - June 2023

edit
 
Women in Red June 2023, Vol 9, Iss 6, Nos 251, 252, 271, 272, 273


Online events:

See also:

Tip of the month:

  • Looking for new red links? Keep an eye out for interesting and notable friends, family, or associates of your last article subject, and re-examine group photos for other women who may still need an article.

Other ways to participate:

  Facebook |   Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 09:14, 28 May 2023 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Deletion discussion about Solveig Argeseanu Cunningham

edit

Hello, BostonMensa, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username BoyTheKingCanDance, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Solveig Argeseanu Cunningham, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solveig Argeseanu Cunningham.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|BoyTheKingCanDance}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 02:12, 31 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Solveig Argeseanu Cunningham for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Solveig Argeseanu Cunningham, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solveig Argeseanu Cunningham until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 1 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:David Ladner

edit

  Hello, BostonMensa. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:David Ladner, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 21 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red July 2023

edit
 
Women in Red June 2023, Vol 9, Iss 7, Nos 251, 252, 274, 275, 276


Online events:

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

  Facebook |   Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 07:42, 27 June 2023 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Nomination of Mekin Mustafa Kemal Ökem for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mekin Mustafa Kemal Ökem is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mekin Mustafa Kemal Ökem until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Alexandermcnabb (talk) 09:00, 8 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

New Page Reviewing

edit
 
Hello, BostonMensa.

I've seen you editing recently and you seem like an experienced Wikipedia editor.
Would you please consider applying to become a New Page Reviewer? Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time but it requires a good understanding of Wikipedia policies and guidelines; currently Wikipedia needs experienced users at this task. But kindly read the tutorial before making your decision. Thanks. Kj cheetham (talk) 15:57, 8 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red 8th Anniversary

edit
  Women in Red 8th Anniversary
In July 2015 around 15.5% of the English Wikipedia's biographies were about women. As of July 2023, 19.61% of the English Wikipedia's biographies are about women. That's a lot of biographies created in the effort to close the gender gap. Happy 8th Anniversary! Join us for some virtual cake and add comments or memories and please keep on editing to close the gap!

--Lajmmoore (talk) 11:00, 18 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Category:College of Brown University Alumni has been nominated for renaming

edit
 

Category:College of Brown University Alumni has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. {{u|Sdkb}}talk 21:37, 22 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Gary Sullivan (restaurateur)

edit

  Hello, BostonMensa. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gary Sullivan (restaurateur), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 23 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Jerry Clark (music executive)

edit

  Hello, BostonMensa. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Jerry Clark (music executive), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 26 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red August 2023

edit
 
Women in Red August 2023, Vol 9, Iss 8, Nos 251, 252, 277, 278, 279, 280


Online events:

See also:

  • Wikimania 2023 will be held in Singapore, 16–19 August, and will be facilitated by the
    affiliates in the ESEAP (East/South East/Asia/Pacific) region.

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

  Facebook |   Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 19:24, 28 July 2023 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Concern regarding Draft:Eva Weigold Schultz

edit

  Hello, BostonMensa. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Eva Weigold Schultz, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:02, 7 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Ian McCary

edit

  Hello, BostonMensa. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ian McCary, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 11 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Julie E. Buring has been accepted

edit
 
Julie E. Buring, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MurielMary (talk) 10:44, 12 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Gary Sullivan (restaurateur)

edit
 

Hello, BostonMensa. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gary Sullivan".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 20:04, 20 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

September 2023 at Women In Red

edit
 
Women in Red September 2023, Vol 9, Iss 9, Nos 251, 252, 281, 282, 283


Online events:

Tip of the month:

  • The books she wrote might be notable, too; learn 5 quick tips about about book articles.

Other ways to participate:

  Facebook |   Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter

--Victuallers (talk) 16:49, 25 August 2023 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Nomination of Olga María Aguja Zúñiga for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Olga María Aguja Zúñiga is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olga María Aguja Zúñiga until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

LibStar (talk) 10:50, 31 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Catherine Evans for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Catherine Evans is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catherine Evans (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

LibStar (talk) 23:59, 4 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red October 2023

edit
 
Women in Red October 2023, Vol 9, Iss 10, Nos 251, 252, 284, 285, 286


Online events:

See also

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

  Facebook |   Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 10:51, 29 September 2023 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Concern regarding Draft:Carrie Barnett

edit

  Hello, BostonMensa. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Carrie Barnett, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 16 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red - November 2023

edit
 
Women in Red November 2023, Vol 9, Iss 11, Nos 251, 252, 287, 288, 289


Online events:

See also

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

  Facebook |   Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 08:21, 26 October 2023 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Concern regarding Draft:Gündoğdu Üstün

edit

  Hello, BostonMensa. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Gündoğdu Üstün, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:06, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Susannah Montgomery for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Susannah Montgomery is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Susannah Montgomery until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Uhooep (talk) 23:47, 12 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red December 2023

edit
 
Women in Red December 2023, Vol 9, Iss 12, Nos 251, 252, 290, 291, 292


Online events:

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

  Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk) 20:22, 27 November 2023 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Michelle Zacarias

edit
 

The article Michelle Zacarias has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

stub; not enough info; not notable enough

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Michelle Zacarias for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Michelle Zacarias is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michelle Zacarias until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

XOR'easter (talk) 21:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red January 2024

edit
 
 
Women in Red | January 2024, Volume 10, Issue 1, Numbers 291, 293, 294, 295, 296


Online events:

Announcement

  • In 2024 Women in Red also has a one biography a week challenge as part
    of the #1day1woman initiative!

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

  Facebook |   Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter

Nomination of Ekaterini Xagorari for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ekaterini Xagorari is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ekaterini Xagorari until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

LibStar (talk) 14:12, 4 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red February 2024

edit
 
Women in Red | February 2024, Volume 10, Issue 2, Numbers 293, 294, 297, 298


Online events:

Announcement

  • Please let other wikiprojects know about our February Black women event.

Tip of the month:

  • AllAfrica can now be searched on the ProQuest tab at the WP Library.

Other ways to participate:

  Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:07, 28 January 2024 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Category:University of Pennsylvania Graduate Division School of Arts & Sciences alumni has been nominated for merging

edit
 

Category:University of Pennsylvania Graduate Division School of Arts & Sciences alumni has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mason (talk) 23:09, 2 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red March 2024

edit
 
Women in Red | March 2024, Volume 10, Issue 3, Numbers 293, 294, 299, 300, 301


Online events:

Announcements

Tip of the month:

  • When creating a new article, check various spellings, including birth name, married names
    and pseudonyms, to be sure an article doesn't already exist.

Other ways to participate:

  Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:21, 25 February 2024 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Women in Red April 2024

edit
 
Women in Red | April 2024, Volume 10, Issue 4, Numbers 293, 294, 302, 303, 304


Online events:

Announcements

  • The second round of "One biography a week" begins in April as part of #1day1woman.

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

  Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter

--Lajmmoore (talk 19:41, 30 March 2024 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Women in Red May 2024

edit
 
Women in Red | May 2024, Volume 10, Issue 5, Numbers 293, 294, 305, 306, 307


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • Use open-access references wherever possible, but a paywalled reliable source
    is better than none, particularly for biographies of living people.

Other ways to participate:

  Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 06:16, 28 April 2024 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Nomination of Morakot Sriswasdi for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Morakot Sriswasdi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Morakot Sriswasdi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Uhooep (talk) 09:55, 18 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Margaret Adamson for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Margaret Adamson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Margaret Adamson (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Uhooep (talk) 20:11, 21 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red June 2024

edit
 
Women in Red | June 2024, Volume 10, Issue 6, Numbers 293, 294, 308, 309, 310


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

  Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 07:04, 23 May 2024 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Women in Red July 2024

edit
 
Women in Red | July 2024, Volume 10, Issue 7, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 312, 313


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • A foreign language biography does not guarantee notability for English Wikipedia.
    Check the guidelines before you start.

Other ways to participate:

  Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 14:26, 30 June 2024 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Women in Red August 2024

edit
 
Women in Red | August 2024, Volume 10, Issue 8, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 313, 314, 315


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

  • TBD

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

  Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 19:56, 25 July 2024 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Proposed deletion of Oleana (restaurant)

edit
 

The article Oleana (restaurant) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Wikipedia is not a directory or replacement for Yellow Pages

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 12 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

September 2024 at Women in Red

edit
 
Women in Red | September 2024, Volume 10, Issue 9, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 316, 317


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

  Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter/X

--Rosiestep (talk) 18:56, 26 August 2024 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Category:Inductees of the Chicago LGBT Hall of Fame has been nominated for deletion

edit
 

Category:Inductees of the Chicago LGBT Hall of Fame has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 17:14, 26 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Women in Red October 2024

edit
 
Women in Red | October 2024, Volume 10, Issue 10, Numbers 293, 294, 318, 319, 320


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

  • Unsure how to expand a stub article? Take a look at this guidance

Other ways to participate:

  Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 08:04, 29 September 2024 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply

Women in Red November 2024

edit
 
Women in Red | November 2024, Vol 10, Issue 11, Nos 293, 294, 321, 322, 323


Online events:

Announcements from other communities

Tip of the month:

Other ways to participate:

  Instagram |   Pinterest |   Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 20:44, 29 October 2024 (UTC) via MassMessagingReply