November 2022

edit
 

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.-- Ponyobons mots 23:56, 10 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

This counts as a fourth revert so please assure others that you will not revert again otherwise you will likely end up getting blocked. Mellk (talk) 00:12, 11 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:First Ukrainian Animation - 1927 - Chaff Goby - Vyacheslav Levandovskiy b.1897 d.1962.jpeg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:First Ukrainian Animation - 1927 - Chaff Goby - Vyacheslav Levandovskiy b.1897 d.1962.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:22, 9 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Animation in Ukraine

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Animation in Ukraine indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz Read! Talk! 05:32, 28 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Flying Ship (folk tale) (June 21)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Taking Out The Trash was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Taking Out The Trash (talk) 16:11, 21 June 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, BowTieTuba! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Taking Out The Trash (talk) 16:11, 21 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from The Fool of the World and the Flying Ship into Flying Ship. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 18:08, 23 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for this comment. I'm not sure which specific text you're referring to. In this case, the intent was to disambiguate separate but related topics, with an intent to improve the encyclopedic resource provided. The initial article edit comment indicates disambiguation from the related film article. I would not consider the mere act of listing a book or media item in a list of materials that reference an idea to be sufficiently creative to be copyrightable, especially when expanded, reworded, and augmented with additional reference information. This would seem to be a substantial change referencing basic public knowledge information. Additionally, the pages are both linked to each other and mutually reference each other, which itself is attribution. The edit chain in both articles is clear and preserved. The intent was to ensure that the information presented was encyclopedic, complete, and contextualized, and all clearly referenced and cited. I would not think copying if any qualifies as extensive, though will keep this in mind in the future to improve clarity and transparency. Thank you again for this feedback. BowTieTuba (talk) 04:16, 25 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, BowTieTuba. Thank you for your work on Grand Kyiv Ballet. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 08:59, 2 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, BowTieTuba. Thank you for your work on Kyiv State Choreographic College. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 10:22, 4 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, BowTieTuba. Thank you for your work on Kyiv City Ballet. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 10:45, 4 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you!

edit
  The Original Barnstar
Thanks for improving Wikipedia's coverage of Ukrainian culture! I'd heard some of these folktales before, but I didn't know they were Ukrainian. BuySomeApples (talk) 03:35, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:The Flying Ship (folk tale)

edit

  Hello, BowTieTuba. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Flying Ship (folk tale), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:07, 23 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, BowTieTuba. Thank you for your work on Baba Yaga (aircraft). Klbrain, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for starting a page on this topic of modern interest. The variety of news sources using the term certain show that its use is widely disseminated.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 22:10, 3 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:The Flying Ship (folk tale)

edit
 

Hello, BowTieTuba. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Flying Ship".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 07:46, 23 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Russian Fairy Tales

edit

Please do not add a footnote with link to the text of the book itself. We need references to information about the book.- Altenmann >talk 00:17, 25 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

@Altenmann, I think you misunderstand - This is from Haney's introduction, an overall summary by Haney of Afanes'ev's work written by the professor of Slavic languages and literature at the University of Washington as an introduction to his work, published by the University Press of Mississippi, even if contained in a book where these tales are translated for English-speaking readers, is absolutely a reference. Where is a Wikipedia policy which states that academic work by professors at accredited universities are not credible sources for references on subjects for which they teach? BowTieTuba (talk) 00:34, 25 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, I indeed was not paying proper attention. Reverted myself. Reference to intro is OK, but simply links to translations belong to the section "Translations". - Altenmann >talk 00:39, 25 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Wikiprojects

edit

Hi, I see you've contributed a lot to Ukrainian folklore, would you be interested in a taskforce on oral tradition? Kowal2701 (talk) 22:22, 26 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Cheremshyna (ensemble) for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cheremshyna (ensemble) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cheremshyna (ensemble) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dclemens1971 (talk) 12:33, 11 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Rushnychok Ukrainian Folk Dance Association for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rushnychok Ukrainian Folk Dance Association is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rushnychok Ukrainian Folk Dance Association until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:03, 18 September 2024 (UTC)Reply