User talk:Bowdlerised

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Daniel Case (talk) 19:23, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bowdlerised (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log) • SI)

---

Request reason:

I have not been pinged regarding any discussion pending as pertains to me or had any chance to defend myself from accusations that I'm someone I never heard of, I have not violated Wikipedia Policy, such as 3RR, and have made good faith edits and promise to keep my word and behave and continue doing so--behaving and making good edits. In this spirit I most kindly request of you to lift this permanent block. Bowdlerised (talk) 19:26, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You are aware wrongly. There is no requirement to notify a user who is sockpuppeting before blocking them. Speaking of, you very noticably say nothing about the fact you are, in fact, blocked for being a sockpuppet. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 05:24, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

By the way, as far as I'm aware, if you don't inform the user of the actions being taken against that user, it's like a mistrial, the whole process is moot and should be dropped at best and restarted at worst. Bowdlerised (talk) 19:31, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Also, I like that image of Karol Nawrocki and have not seen any argument that it's copyrighted, only 1 user Malyzolwikson keeps asking for it to be deleted and his requests are met so fast no one has time to even ask for proof. Bowdlerised (talk) 19:36, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Your edit

Special:Diff/1341152944 Why did you try to sneak in another change against the consensus on the talk page? --wojtekpolska^{₁₀₁₃ [talk page]} 23:46, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

actually i only copied and pasted the beginning of the article from before the cringe "hussars" edit, i.e. restored revision Bowdlerised (talk) 23:50, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

your edit also changed "parliamentary republic" to "semi-presidential republic". --wojtekpolska^{₁₀₁₃ [talk page]} 14:31, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

even if you only intended to change something related to hussars, your edit description did not reflect that either, which makes me believe you were hoping nobody would notice. that's not a good practice --wojtekpolska^{₁₀₁₃ [talk page]} 14:35, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

also i would really welcome it if at least you could remove that line about the hussars from the lede that was added by the PolskaPL user a few days ago Bowdlerised (talk) 23:51, 1 March 2026 (UTC)