Brainmuncher
I changed my name to RedRabbit. Brainmuncher 17:32, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
|
Hypericum
editGreat work on copyediting St Johns Wort. --Red King 17:56, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks, Red King. Brainmuncher 10:24, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
Thanks so much for the great copyediting. I could use some help on A Vindication of the Rights of Woman if you have time. If you need any help on a page, just let me know. Awadewit 08:32, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks, Awadewit. Certainly, I should be glad to help you on A Vindication of the Rights of Woman. I shall be quite busy later, but when I have the time, I will start this. Well done on attaining a star for Barbauld. Brainmuncher 01:43, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Kind request: could you do some of your copy-editing work in Manuel I Komnenos article? It is in WP:FARC right now, and I try to keep it featured. Thanks in advance!--Yannismarou 18:14, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Cicero´s bruised ego
editYou have much improved the language in the page on Cicero! Many thanks for it. Because I am not a native speaker of English, I have naturally certain limitations, - but wishing to overcome them. Anyway, I am going to revert the sentence about Cicero´s bruised ego. It is not slang, it is an attempt to make a psychoterapeutical analysis of Cicero´s psyche. --Tellervo 11:44, 2 March 2007 (UTC)
Gray wolf
editSorry, travelling at the moment, so I can't commit to serious copy-edits. Tony 05:09, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
- Watch out for the wolves! Brainmuncher 04:54, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
Cicero and copyediting
editWould you, please, continue with the copyeding of the Cicero page? I will add something about Cicero's mature thoughts on philosophy but otherwise all necessary material is there. Remember you promised to make it a FA article! --Tellervo 12:41, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
On deadlines
editNice, that you answered so soon! A three month deadline is OK, end of this year IMO too long. I suppose I am by the end of this year concentrating on something else. --Tellervo 14:11, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
William Monahan article at FAC
editHello Brainmuncher. Would you be interested in reviewing my article on William Monahan? I'm currently running it through its paces at WP:FAC. any comments you might have would be appreciated.-BillDeanCarter 04:05, 16 March 2007 (UTC)
Bye, bye
editSad, that you have to leave! So, I will not hear about your new identity on your user page for some time!?! Nor how your Eraser Buddy is doing! Well happy studying. Read a little about Cicero, if you have time. Greetings --Tellervo 20:01, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Goblins in modern fiction for deletion
editA discussion is taking place as to whether the article Goblins in modern fiction is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goblins in modern fiction until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 14:21, 13 February 2020 (UTC)