Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Sure, I'll take another look. Jakob 04:06, 9 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
Take a look at this and this to add references inside the text. Let me know if you have problems, I'd be more than happy to help!   --Jakob 17:24, 9 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
Tommy Seigler, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Tito Dutta (talk) 12:07, 21 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bob Shaw (Georgia politician) (May 2)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 00:02, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
Can you be more specific about what needs to be cleaned up? Also, there are twenty sources from major universities, newspapers, and government agencies. Why are these not reliable sources? Brandonseigler (talk) 18:23, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
I went through and scrubbed the article for anything that may sound colloquial. I also updated all of the news article links to have proper news citations. I found a copy of the Atlanta Magazine article and added it to the citation. Brandonseigler (talk) 18:14, 4 May 2023 (UTC)Reply
If you could please take a look at the page again, I have found many more sources, edited the citations as requested, and changed the language where necessary. Thanks. Brandonseigler (talk) 21:36, 12 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Brandonseigler! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusW🐶🐶F (barksniff) 00:02, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest

edit

  Hello, Brandonseigler. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 20:48, 14 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply