Bretalins
| This is Bretalins's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Ozaroo (October 28)
edit
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ozaroo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ozaroo, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, Bretalins!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 20:21, 28 October 2020 (UTC)
|
November 2020
edit
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 14:49, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
Bretalins (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I came here to make edits and contribute to Wikipedia. I have only one conflict of interest where I edited and submitted the page of my employer. I have necessary declaration for this on my userpage. Apart from that all my other edits have no conflict of interest. I participated in a few AfDs and everywhere I made only policy based arguments. I am not a sock or meatpuppet and have not used Wikipedia for advertising or self-promotion. Please do check my contributions so far. I just want to make my contributions to the Wikipedia and if I made a mistake then please inform me and I will rectify because I am a quick lerner. This block is not necessary and I will make only positive contributions if unblocked. Please consider this appeal as a request for a second chance.Bretalins (talk) 15:28, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
After examining your edits, I am in complete agreement with MER-C- and until you choose to be more forthcoming, I see no pathway to being unblocked for you. As such, I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 15:50, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- 331dot, could you please be more specific? At least provide me with a diff so I can understand! I do not see how much more I need to explain here. All I feel here is misuse of admin rights. So far I edited a few articles, participated in a few AfDs including improving an article[1] that I will be expanding if unblocked and submitting an article about my employer. Could you please care to explain a bit more? Thank you.Bretalins (talk) 18:26, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
- All I will say is that it is clear from your edits that you either are not a new editor or you have been educated by others on editing. 331dot (talk) 18:33, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
- 331dot, and how is that related with my unblock appeal please? Learning Wikipedia is not a rocket science. Afterall it is a wiki and I have been registered for several months. Bretalins (talk) 18:37, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
- You are free to make another unblock request for another administrator to review in which you make that argument, and see how it goes. I'm quite confident in my views, but I'm not the last word. 331dot (talk) 18:42, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
- 331dot, and how is that related with my unblock appeal please? Learning Wikipedia is not a rocket science. Afterall it is a wiki and I have been registered for several months. Bretalins (talk) 18:37, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
- All I will say is that it is clear from your edits that you either are not a new editor or you have been educated by others on editing. 331dot (talk) 18:33, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
Bretalins (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I failed to convince a reviewing admin but I am appealing again because this block is not necessary. In continutation with my previous unblock request, I want to emphasise that so far I did not intend to harm Wikipedia and you will see only positive contributions from me if unblocked. Thank you. Bretalins (talk) 18:53, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Unfortunately, this request was insufficient to convince an administrator to unblock you.
You are welcome to try again, with a new, significantly reworded request. SQLQuery me! 16:08, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.