Briankervin

July 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at User talk:137.240.136.86, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Gwernol 11:52, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Frivolous tags

Please cease from adding frivolous, seemingly arbitrary, tags, or you will be restricted from further edits. Thx. El_C 12:56, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Huh?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Briankervin (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Lunchbox21". The reason given for Lunchbox21's block is: "Abusing multiple accounts".

Decline reason:

Its very obvious from your editing history that you are a sockpupept account of Lunchbox21. Therefore I am not only declining this unblock request, I am indefinitely blocking this account for abuse of sockpuppet acounts. Gwernol 17:15, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I don't understand?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Briankervin (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

What is this and who is Lunchbox21? I'm not a sock puppet! I was trying to stop a sock puppet and now I'm blocked and have false accusations against my user account? What in the world is going on? Briankervin (talk) 17:57, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Decline reason:

These assertions do not cause me to doubt the blocking administrator's judgment in blocking you. —  Sandstein  19:05, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

When will I be able to edit again?

To Whom it may concern:

I'm just wondering if and when I will be able to edit again. My account isn't a sock puppet and after further reading I understand how this could happen since 7,000+ employees share the same IP. Please let me know. I won't ask to be unblocked again unless I feel this matter can not be resolved through the admin dealing with me. Thank you for your time. Briankervin (talk) 19:23, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

You are blocked indefinatly due to sockpuppetry... the evidence is here, a secondary reason for the indef block would be your disruptive edits here, here, and here. - Adolphus79 (talk) 19:56, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Teddy Bear?

But the Teddy bear is named after the brown bear and I thought you were a sock puppet of .86? It wasn't until afterward I understood the mix up? Briankervin (talk) 20:51, 15 July 2008 (UTC)