BritishIndian

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. Such edits are considered vandalism and quickly undone. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. --Ragib (talk) 22:16, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Hey Rajib,

I am not sure what qualification you have to judge my insertion,but I am not doing vandalism. YOU are following the wrong information provided by old European historians like Max Mueller and William Jones about the Vedas. We knoe today that the River Saraswati existed more that 4000-5000 years ago. Therefore hymns ot River Saraswati are from a period when the river was mighty along with Sindhu which is also mentioned in the Rig Veda. For your knowledge you can read the following website:

http://www.gisdevelopment.net/application/archaeology/site/archs0001.htm knowledge but BritishIndian (talk) 22:52, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Your writeup was sans any references. The site you link here is also not a scholarly site, rather a self published site. In any case, you can always raise your point in the article talk page. --Ragib (talk) 23:08, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

The talk page you are looking for is Talk:Rigveda. --Ragib (talk) 20:21, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Stars

Can you please stop inserting large numbers of stars in your edits, they make the page scroll horizontally which is bad. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 21:42, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Vandalism? or is it Ignorance and Prejudice by Editors?

This seems more than a little excessive for it to be semi-protected indefinitely - especially as there are good IP edits. Do you mind reconsidering? -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 08:47, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 16:01, 31 July 2010 (UTC) Thank you too for pointing out the protection duration. 1 day should be fine to thwart anon/newbie vandals. --Ragib (talk) 16:07, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

More about the ancient Indian text RIG VEDA

Here is one more web-site which talks about the River Saraswati, and what the Gujarat and Rajasthan Govts are doing to rediscover the 'Mighty Saraswati' on the banks of which the Vedic Civilisation was founded:

http://www.stephen-knapp.com/recent_research_on_the_sarasvati_river.htm

It is high time we start rubbishing the false-preaching of supremacist European historians from the last century. We have to start realising that The Vedic culture of Sindhu-Saraswati river valley is much older that any European culture. Europe was under miles of ice during 35000-7000 BCE anyway, which historians of the last century did not even know of. However much guys like you try, it will be ultimately proved that its Vedic culture which has civilised the people of the world, and Sanskrit has travelled all over the world from the Sindhu-Saraswati river civilisation. The fact the there are so many words in Europe that have evolved from Sanskrit prove the fact. For eg.- Dwar-door, danta-denta, naaw-vigyan- navigation, gau-cow, dwo-two, tri-three, pancha-penta, sasta-sexa, sapta-septa, ashta-octa, nava-nova, dasa-deca, deva/ devi-devine, etc etc.. Also know very well, there was no civilisation in Central Asia from where Vedic civilisation came to India. It was all under ice upto 7000 BCE. Indus Valley Civilisation (Sindhu-Saraswati civilisation) is at least 9000 years old. Research Mehrgarh for yourself! I don't know where you are from or who you are. But knowledge about ancient India cannot be subverted by guys like you for much longer. BritishIndian (talk) 20:06, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Nice rant. :). But wrong page. The talk page you are looking for is Talk:Rigveda. --Ragib (talk) 20:21, 31 July 2010 (UTC)