Broomwick

Hi! Not to worry. The original article still exists. The redirect was implausible, so I deleted only that. You're OK otherwise.  :) --PMDrive1061 (talk) 01:11, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Notability of elementary schools

In general, schools that are below the high school level are not presumed to be notable. The article must show that they meet wikipedia's notability requirements for organizations or its general notability requirements. Your recent contributions:

• Bethel Manor Elementary School
• Coventry Elementary School
• Tabb Elementary School

and

• Mount Vernon Elementary School

do not do this yet.

Most elementary schools do not meet Wikipedia's notability criteria and articles should not be written about them. There are exceptions, such as schools which are famous at a state or national level or recognized at a national level, such as Blue Ribbon Schools. All other schools should either not exist at all or be just a redirect to the article about their school district, school system, or city. In this case, it's York County School Division. Cities and school systems should have articles, if the ones for these schools do not, create them. Depending on how exclusive it is and how much "non-trivial" coverage it generates, Tabb may qualify for its own article by virtue of receiving the Governor's Award for Educational Excellence. However, if this is an award given out to more than a very small percentage of elementary schools each year, it's probably not going to help. If it's an award given out to only 2 or 3, it almost certainly qualifies. If the number is in between it's iffy. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 02:50, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

I've started a merger discussion at Talk:York County School Division#Merge in elementary schools to discuss merging these 4 articles plus Tabb Middle School into the school division article. Please read Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grafton Middle School for a similar discussion from 2007. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 03:03, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Sources

While I have not seen any specific problems with your additions to List of popes, they have not been attributed (see Talk:List of popes#Many Missing References). In order to be verifiable, additions need to be attributed to reliable sources, especially descriptions like "suspected to" (by whom). Please do not leave it to others to support your changes. If you have sources but need technical assistance formatting references, just ask.Novangelis (talk) 18:20, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

I believe all of my contributions to List of popes are simply quick factoids taken from other Wikipedia pages. Should I still cite these? If so, how?

I also don't like my wording on that "suspected to" part. Any recommendations on how to re-word?

Wikipedia is not a source for Wikipedia (WP:CIRCULAR). The key would be to find the sources used on the individual pages. A major problem is that some of the individual pages are not well attributed. This can be problematic since someone might use Wikipedia as a source and propagate false claims, then someone uses that as a source. This is why I try to push sourcing, and fill it in as I can. As for "suspected to", check the source and see what is said. You might get something concise but more specific (e.g. "The Anglican Church accused..." or "Issued a Papal Bull..."). Additionally, I refactored your comments by indenting using a leading colon on each line. It is a convention in discussions, but your talk page is yours, so if I was out of line, please inform me.Novangelis (talk) 19:06, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Thank you, I actually did not know the colon-indenting trick. I'll try to source what I can. Thanks for your help!

I just started reviewing the edits. There was a problem with the fist one. Henry IV of France was excommunicated by Sixtus V and Gregory XIV endorsed the prior excommunication. [1] [2] This is why we rely on footnotes to make for easy verification.Novangelis (talk) 22:16, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Roy D. Bridges, Jr., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Test Pilot (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Broomwick. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Broomwick. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:24, 24 November 2020 (UTC)