राजकुमार

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk)  17:22, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

October 2024

I am allowed to be bold when removing content that violates NPOV, and I am allowed to revert edits which flagrantly misappropriate sources without discussion. You should read WP:ONUS and be mindful when reverting edits in the India-Pakistan-Afghanistan topic area. ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk)  18:53, 19 October 2024 (UTC)

I am allowed to revert any edit that appears biased toward a specific subject. राजकुमार^(talk) 03:18, 20 October 2024 (UTC)

You are expected to assume good faith of your fellow editors. Calling edits vandalism which are not vandalism, which you did here is disruptive and raises the temperature of any subsequent discussion. Additionally, restoring the word "terrorist" violates NPOV yet again. ― "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk)  13:32, 22 October 2024 (UTC)