Buckbill10

Buckbill10, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Buckbill10! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Dathus (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:20, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Are you Tetra Quark?

Hi Buckbill10,

Welcome to editing Wikipedia!

I'm mildly concerned that your editing pattern looks somewhat similar to that of another editor, Tetra quark, so I thought I'd ask straight up. Are you the same editor? If not, my apologies. —Alex (Ashill | talk | contribs) 15:05, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Since you have not responded to this question while responding to a number of other questions on the talk page and your editing pattern is very similar to Tetra quark's, I have opened a sock puppet investigation: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tetra quark. —Alex (Ashill | talk | contribs) 20:06, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Good luck, I guess. Buckbill10 (talk) 23:28, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

July 2015

Your recent editing history at Light-year shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Scr★pIron^IV 15:47, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

@ScrapIronIV: Fine, fine. Ugh. The article looks so empty without an image, animation or whatever. I remember there was an image in the past, but now someone removed it. Buckbill10 (talk) 15:49, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Dark energy shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Scr★pIron^IV 18:46, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

@ScrapIronIV: stop Buckbill10 (talk) 19:06, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Stop edit warring across multiple pages, and I will stop sending you warnings. Scr★pIron^IV 19:07, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

@ScrapIronIV: You gave me two first-warning messages btw Buckbill10 (talk) 19:10, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

Actually, I gave you separate "Single Warning" messages as you approached 3RR; one for each instance. I was trying to be kind; others would simply report you. Scr★pIron^IV 19:13, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Buckbill10 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

what are you guys even talking about? Buckbill10 (talk) 12:29, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Reading all of the messages on this talk pages makes it abundantly clear what these guys are talking about. It's pretty obvious that you are Tetra Quark; you'll need to address that first. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 13:49, 14 July 2015 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.