Elliott Wall

Intentions

Thank you for your patience- this is a different world for me and I have a lot to learn- insights and help are greatly appreciated. Buckwheatandgrits (talk) 23:38, 27 March 2011 (UTC)

The first inset box on the article for Determinism seems to me to misrepresent the nature of the subject; determinism, I'm pretty sure, does not assert that the future is predictable at all, only that everything in the universe happens because of some antecedent cause(s) (however unknowable). However many various determinist philosophers have averred this hypothetically predictable (mechanistic) view is of no consequence and doesn't make this view a deterministic one; i.e., some determinists believe the future could (hypothetically) be predicted, but just because someone doesn't believe this doesn't mean they aren't a determinist. I haven't even read the article fully yet... I've just noticed this right off the bat. In fact, Karl Popper, in "The Open Universe", I think totally disproves the notion that any event in the future could be predicted with any specified degree of precision, though he himself admits that he has not disproved determinism ontologically. I'll work this out better a little later- determinism is a pet subject for me and I think the entry could use work! Buckwheatandgrits (talk) 23:38, 27 March 2011 (UTC) (fixed) Buckwheatandgrits (talk) 21:55, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Just added a section to the Protoculture page, showing how the Nazis were trying to obtain Vril energy! Buckwheatandgrits (talk) 21:55, 3 April 2011 (UTC)

Salutations

Welcome!

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! HamatoKameko (talk) 20:22, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Notability of Andy Paiko

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Andy Paiko, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Andy Paiko seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Andy Paiko, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 22:51, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

Hangon tag

Another editor added the speedy delete tag to Andy Paiko. I saw your note on the talk page, so I've gone ahead and added the hangon tag for you which notifies administrators that you want to contest the deletion and work on this article. Cheers — CactusWriter | ^needles 23:28, 7 February 2009 (UTC)

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Andy Paiko has been reverted.

Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): \byoutube\.com (links: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lzyb1o9yruc). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. Video links are also strongly deprecated by our guidelines for external links, partly because they're useless to people with slow internet connections.

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 22:25, 8 February 2009 (UTC)

Your attention needed at WP:CHU

Hello. A bureaucrat or clerk has responded to your username change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up at your username change request entry as soon as possible. Thank you. Tyrol5 [Talk] 04:14, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Into the Deep (January 12)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Into the Deep and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 05:42, 12 January 2016 (UTC)

Draft:Into the Deep concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Into the Deep, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:37, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Into the Deep

Hello, Elliott Wall. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Into the Deep".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. —MRD2014 T C 02:32, 13 July 2016 (UTC)