May 2012

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to KEGG, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: KEGG was changed by Buddyfire917 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.955958 on 2012-05-08T16:36:43+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:36, 8 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Log-periodic antenna. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Buddyfire917 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I don't even know what the page is that I was blocked for. I have never heard of the topic in the article and am kind of confused.

Decline reason:

You can review your previous contributions here. Kuru (talk) 00:41, 17 December 2014 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Buddyfire917 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

That as years ago. I had no idea that I was really changing the pages for everyone, and didn't realize it until I got banned. I wanted to edit some recent pages I have visited with wrong information, but could not do so since I was banned. I don't want to cause harm to Wikipedia, because i use it a lot for research at school.

Decline reason:

Yes that was years ago, but it's the only information available. In this context, I'm declining your request. PhilKnight (talk) 12:11, 5 February 2015 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Buddyfire917 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I already understand what I did, and I want to Help Wikipedia out in any way I can, by completing unfinished lists and updating any old information. I really do apologize for what I have done, and would never do it again. I have never made another account and tried to do this again, which I would have done if I really wanted to harm Wikipedia in any way. This should be another obvious reason as to why I should be unbanned. Thank you.

Accept reason:

I'll assume good faith here and have unblocked you. Welcome back, and happy editing! Huon (talk) 00:41, 7 February 2015 (UTC)Reply