Bueller911

Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed by an automated bot. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. If you feel you have received this notice in error, please contact the bot owner // Tawkerbot2 22:58, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

The Ceaser Code as described on the page is unverifiable and original research. I'm happy to stop redirecting the page, but the other choice would be to delete the material unless sources can be provided. Christopher Parham (talk) 23:38, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

• Indeed it is an original source, which is why Wikipedia cannot accept it. See Wikipedia:No original research, an official policy. Christopher Parham (talk) 23:44, 27 March 2006 (UTC)