Buff 4u2000

Khanzadipur

A small village located 42 km from the world famous spiritual city of Varanasi in UP, India. Although it’s a small village, it is home to a diverse group of local residents comprising of farmers, artisans, weavers, teachers, truck drivers, professors, retired govt. and private sector employees and many others. It even has a fully operational Post Office, something that is considered as a luxury in small Indian villages. Commuting is no problem for the village folks as buses, rickshaws, and taxis regularly ply on the two-lane road that connects the NH 4. India’s economic growth has somehow managed to touch this seemingly remote village, evidence of which can be seen in shabbily dressed farmers using mobile phones for communicating with their friends, families and associates. Village elders vouch for the development that is currently taking place in India and have a nagging habit of informing youngsters about how they survived the rough seas and emerged unscathed when most Indian villages faced utmost poverty and famine like situations. The weary eyes of village elders tell you everything and in a way reflect the country’s social and economic history after the independence. The village has schools up to eighth grade, after which students have to trek 2 miles daily to a nearby village having schooling facilities up to 12th grade. Entertainment options are quite limited in the village as there are no movie theaters and village folks cannot depend on television because electricity is a huge problem. The areas surrounding the village are however very scenic. Some of the best weekend destinations are located in and around the village. If you get to Khanzadipur, do not forget to visit the majestic Ganges, the impressive Chunar fort, and innumerable water falls that dot the nearby landscape.

Akhilesh Yadav

It is governments that introduce policies, not individuals. Please stop ascribing welfare policies to Akhilesh Yadav - we already know that he has a cult of personality but Wikipedia is not a fan site. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 12:07, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

September 2016

Your recent editing history at Akhilesh Yadav shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sitush (talk) 13:41, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Okay, it seems that only i am editing. What about you? You are doing the same thing, aren't you? You are trying to intimidate me, which is an offence mind you. I believe my content provides a comprehensive view of Akhilesh Yadav, so i have every right to post it. You are blindly rejecting all logic and rationality and repeatedly deleting my additions. You seem prejudiced and seem to have a personal agenda. Thank you for your warnings, but they apply to you as well. Buff 4u2000 (talk) 13:53, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Read the civility policy. Your comments toward Sitush are not entirely civil and are close to being personal attacks. Do not use language toward another editor that would offend you if used toward you. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:13, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

And what about Sitush acting as a rogue policemen, trying to curtain freedom and preventing users from updating content. Wiki is a headless state that gives rise to rogue agents like you and Sitush, who are probably working for commission and making money by taking control of certain pages. Sitush started being uncivil by repeatedly deleting my relevant content without any sound logic, so first blame him.

First Sitush said the government does the development work and not the chief minister. Later i changed it to government, but then also he deleted the content. Can you please ask him why he did that? He said government and so i changed to government, but he again deleted it. Where's the logic in that? Where's the civility in that? Where's anything in that? It's just his thinking that he owns certain pages, and considers himself superior to the rest of the world, that he is doing such acts. I have never seen such a pompous person like Sitush.

First, look into the facts - who started the civil crisis, then blame me. You are only seeing one side of the story. Buff 4u2000 (talk) 06:25, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:01, 24 September 2016 (UTC)