Buffy0123
This user is a student editor in Linguistics/Language_and_Mind_(Fall_2019) . |
Welcome!
editHello, Buffy0123, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 14:33, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
Response
editHi! I wanted to reply on your talk page. I marked the page with that because it had the following issues:
- The page needs sourcing - there are many things on the page that lack an in-line citation that shows where the material was pulled from. This contributes to the issue of original research, since it comes across as something that we came up with on our own as opposed to summarizing what was stated in the sources.
- There are some statements that are written from a specific point of view, such as the passage below:
- This is a very strong take on linguistic relativism, literally making language the "prison" that our minds are trapped in. According to Nietzsche we could not comprehend things like table, or rain without the words being present in our language.
- Point of view statements such as "very strong" is original research since it's us adding our own opinions to the page as opposed to adding something that an authority stated in the source. The reason for this is that when we write from our own point of view, it comes across as being in Wikipedia's voice - ie, a definitive statement. The only time we should write this is when it's a very widely held statement and even then, it has to be extremely carefully phrased and attributed.
- Something else to be careful of is to avoid using "we" and "our" in the writing, as Wikipedia uses the third person style. It also comes across as being written by a specific person and presumes something of the reader. See this for more information on that end. This also comes across as very casual, which should be avoided.
I hope that this helps explain the tags! Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 21:37, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Start a discussion with Buffy0123
Talk pages are where people discuss how to make content on Wikipedia the best that it can be. Start a new discussion to connect and collaborate with Buffy0123. What you say here will be public for others to see.