Buger677
your draft and related comments
editI reverted your edit to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Council per WP:NOTAFORUM because that's not the place to ask for help with Draft:Corruption in the United Arab Emirates. Regarding that draft, it's not an article. We would need you to read everything on that subject, write a narrative of at least a few sentences discussing it, and provide a bunch of citations to reliable sources to show the topic is notable. Generally speaking, new editors should not attempt to write new articles. Chris Troutman (talk) 21:13, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
- Ok thank you for your feedback. Hoping I can be the exception to that rule and perhaps offer a decent read with plenty of notable sources and helpful information on the topic. Sorry about posting that discussion in the wrong place. My mistake. Thanks. Buger677 (talk) 21:35, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Albert Fish talk page
editWanted to recommend that you add a small bit of formatting to your suggestion - just add a blank line between the original text, the word 'to', and then before the new text. As it is now it looks like one run-on duplicated section. cheers. anastrophe, an editor he is. 21:52, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for the advice. I'll do that right now. thanks. Buger677 (talk) 22:07, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
edit{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 02:34, 4 January 2023 (UTC)- @Callanecc: The investigation isn't even over. How can you block me per "evidence" at the sockpuppet investigation. I should get fair treatment. How am I am able to defend myself against claims if I have editing revoked beforehand the investigation should be fair and allow me to defend myself. Wait until the results, please unblock me until then. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Buger677 (talk • contribs) 04:38, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
- My purpose in filing that SPI case was to request a CheckUser to have a look for additional accounts not to confirm that you are Jacobkennedy. The intersection between your edits and the other accounts and IP linked to Jacobkennedy are strong enough to justify a block without additional technical evidence that could be provided by a CheckUser. You are free to appeal the block using the details in the block notice if you would like another administrator to look at the evidence. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:52, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
- What intersection are you referring to? I see no resemblance of anything. Buger677 (talk) 07:34, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
- Well let's start with what was in the SPI case, why, just after becoming autoconfirmed, did you make this series of edits? Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:16, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
- I had 10 edits, not the 8 minimum before I made those edits. The timing was a coincidence at worst, and was in reality just timing that is unfortunate. Buger677 (talk) 06:56, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
- Well let's start with what was in the SPI case, why, just after becoming autoconfirmed, did you make this series of edits? Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:16, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
- What intersection are you referring to? I see no resemblance of anything. Buger677 (talk) 07:34, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
- My purpose in filing that SPI case was to request a CheckUser to have a look for additional accounts not to confirm that you are Jacobkennedy. The intersection between your edits and the other accounts and IP linked to Jacobkennedy are strong enough to justify a block without additional technical evidence that could be provided by a CheckUser. You are free to appeal the block using the details in the block notice if you would like another administrator to look at the evidence. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 04:52, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
@UtoD: please revert yourself for now. I have been blocked as a "sock" without proof and before a usercheck even occurred. Also, please advise this seems very unfair to block and revert me before the investigation even finished. Thank you. Buger677 (talk) 03:46, 4 January 2023 (UTC)