Bulmabriefs144
Welcome. Post your comments, but keep to my rules, or face my wraith.
 | This user contributes to WikiProject Explosives. |
NO!!! No more
editAfter someone tried to threaten me with blocking, I won't stand for it. I won't stand for being accused of mass vandalism, when all I tried to do was RENAME an article to Selena Perez, because it reflected her first and last name. If you have a gripe, keep it within the edit history, which I actually read. It is within my rights as a human being not to have some jerk decide they understand me when they don't, categorizing me and subcategorizing me like meat or fish. You fix any mess I make yourself, because if you don't like it, it becomes YOUR responsibility not mine. I like it, so unless you do something it stays. And unless it is told to me, I won't know, and frankly WON'T CARE. I have done what I believe is right, and what I believe is right may not be reflected by the WP rules and guidelines, which I am am told can also be rewritten/changed at a whim (the Okashinas Okashi for instance was told by its web owner that one of the people voting its deletion actually changed the rules to support their theory, requiring articles to be notable by having two outside sources, rather than just being well-cited as any research paper would be). I will not be accused, threaten, abused, unless you try to walk a mile in my shoes. And since nobody has offered to do this, and actually ASK why I do something before posting an annoying comment (or even a threat to block as the last jerk did), if I EVER see this sort of thing again, I will delete the comment, trace your user page down and possibly give you Hell. I'm a zealous and stubborn (and deeply wounded) person, but don't you dare accuse me of being something other than that, for I won't stand for it. The only comments I will welcome are "hey I made ... change to your article." Sure, whatever I don't care as long as you did it after about a day or two later when I've stopped writing and stopped caring. But 
warning pics or threats to "you better stop or else" will be personally displayed on the talk page as a PERSONAL ATTACK. I'm tired of it. Bulmabriefs144 (talk) 02:15, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
- Wtf was that? I don't even like Facebook. Bulmabriefs144 (talk) 05:35, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
Genju of the Realm listed at Redirects for discussion
edit
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Genju of the Realm. Since you had some involvement with the Genju of the Realm redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Steel1943 (talk) 04:32, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
- No thanks Bulmabriefs144 (talk) 17:13, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
edit
Hello, Bulmabriefs144. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
edit Hello, Bulmabriefs144. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The redirect It's dangerous to go alone! Take this. has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 1 § It's dangerous to go alone! Take this. until a consensus is reached. Okmrman (talk) 04:47, 1 April 2024 (UTC)