Bunser

Deletion of page "Gopal Kundu Controvesy" from article "Scientific plagiarism in India

Hello,

The page "Gopal Kundu Controvesy" of article "Scientific plagiarism in India" contains invalid information about him and the controversy, He is a former scientist who has registered patents and works at National Centre for Cell Science (NCCS), Pune, India. The page also refers to unofficial invalid sources. I request you to check official website of NCCS,Pune,India which is a Indian government body. the URL is www.nccs.res.in/gck.html. Please consider this request because it affects his reputation.

Thanks. Shrikantbhalerao101 (talk) 12:10, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Shrikantbhalerao101 has posted this to about 13 different users' talk pages. In order to avoid unnecessary duplication of effort, before considering replying, you may like to see my responses here and here. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:30, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Restart AFD?

User:Karfks, the creator of that list, confessed over here at User talk:Karfks to essentially every rule his article is breaking. Should you restart the AFD now, or wait until one week has passed from the last one's closure, I will wait either way.Haydar Haydar (talk) 02:17, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

I'm not sure to wait exactly one week, since most notably Users Esuc andSixpence have done nothing at all prior to suddenly showing up at the AFD to vote no to deletion. Sixpence was absent from wikipedia for four years and then suddenly showed up to vote no at the AFD, his last edit was adding cases of penis removal to the article on penis removal. No doubt they are going to pop up again with exactly the same vote the next time around no matter if its one week or one years.

furthermore, the fake image Esuuc uploaded has to be deleted, because #1 it was from an anti islamic blog, and blogs are not WP:RS, #2, its a fake picture created by the ownder of that blog, #3, even if real, it violated fair use and contributed nothing at all. Most notably, the person who faked the image forget that muslims practice circumcision, and the severed penis was uncircumcised in the photo. I;m going to take this up with an admin if it isn't clearedBunser (talk) 05:35, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

I will decide about the AFD tommorrow. As I said, the people who voted no are still going to show up and vote no again regardless of when it takes place.Bunser (talk) 05:45, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

I will be respectful of DGG's request to wait until this week ends. It will be in bad form to rush this.Bunser (talk) 22:25, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Admission

I confirm that I am Karfks and made this confession here

I really did think it was amusing as long as nobody noticed that I was doing it or guessed why I was doing it, it was pretty funny when I inserted references to penis removal in Xili Subdistrict, Shenzhen and Yueqing. And when I posted the link to the article on multiple forums, the reaction was hilarious. Were you one of the people in the forums who responded negatively and complained that I was only listing Chinese women?Nayyurc (talk) 03:04, 16 November 2011 (UTC) ‎

I will not object to the removal of the list, since you guys found me out, but my other edits, like to Women in the Philippines should stay since they are germane to the topic.Nayyurc (talk) 03:06, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

I will make sure to link this confession to any AFD brought up on the article in the future. I suggest you to explain yourself there too.Bunser (talk) 05:28, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

I think there is a simpler way to proceed. I have placed a speedy delete for copyvio tag on the article, and m waiting for confirmation by another administrator. Newly discovered (or newly clarified) undoubted copyvio supersedes prior AfDs .

Bunser, I want to give you my extremely appreciative thanks for effectively continuing to deal with this. I ask you to follow up with the images.

I also need to say that Nayyurc did the right thing finally by admitting the situation. DGG ( talk ) 06:40, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for acting on the copyvio.Bunser (talk) 19:03, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

problem

There seems to be no problem.Sino-Malay (talk) 21:01, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

I've been watching many asian related articles for several months, and that ROC name changer thing just slipped under my nose. There seems to be alot of sneaking around when they tried to make it pass through at first.Sino-Malay (talk) 22:08, 15 March 2012 (UTC)