Bunzyfunzy

Welcome!

Hello, Bunzyfunzy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Shirelive, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Mattinbgn\^talk 11:50, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Shirelive

I have nominated Shirelive, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shirelive. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Mattinbgn\^talk 11:50, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Shirelive

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Shirelive, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://shirelive.com/index.php/staff, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL), versions 1.3 or later then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Shirelive and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Shirelive with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Shirelive.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Shirelive saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:23, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Recreation (and subsequent nomination for speedy deletion) of Shirelive

I noted you recreated Shirelive, after it was deleted. At this time, I feel compelled to point you to the Articles for Deletion page, which has an explanation of deletion protocol. Also, I do need to note that, once an article's deleted, if it's substantially the same, then we reserve the right to delete it immediately. I do respect your church, but for the purpose, rather than recreating it ad infinitum (which is typically seen as vandalism), might I suggest reviewing our notability guidelines before reposting again?

Thanks,, --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 00:11, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Shirelive

A tag has been placed on Shirelive, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Bidgee (talk) 15:33, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Shirelive

A tag has been placed on Shirelive, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Bidgee (talk) 02:42, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Shirelive

Hello Bunzy: I have moved your Shire Live article to User:Bunzyfunzy/Shirelivechurch it will need to include references to reliable sources to defeat the argument in the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shirelive. The latest resusitation of the article was exactly the same as the deleted version. The content itself is OK, it just needs references in things like newspapers etc. Hope you can get the article up to scratch. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 10:48, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

It may be different to your first draft, but it is still very similar to the version that was voted for deletion. So although I would normally have left it there, I have to follow the concensus at the AfD. Perhaps you can get a deletion review at WP:DRV. People in Glass Houses: An Insider's Story of a Life in and Out of Hillsong would not necessarily be a reliable source, and the web pages of the church and its organisation are not independent, although they certainly confirm facts. I am hust making suggestions that could let you get past the AfD arguments, which is to find some more references from the media to show notability. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:32, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 23:54, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

May 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2009 May 17. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. You can't remove another editor's comment on any talk page other then your own talk page. Bidgee (talk) 12:59, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Blocked for 3 days

Hello. As a result of findings at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bunzyfunzy, I have blocked you for 3 days for abusing multiple accounts on a deletion review. When the block expires, please do not repeat this behaviour, or you will be blocked for a longer period. See also WP:SOCK#LEGIT for allowed uses of multiple accounts. Thank you. PeterSymonds (talk) 12:59, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

review of shirelivechurch

I have been asked to review this article, and you will find my comments at [1]. What I need to ask you more specifically, is if you can provide any verification for the factual basis of that article. Attendance and membership are critical figures. Please respond to me there. DGG ( talk ) 18:13, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problems with File:SHIRELIVE AUDITORIUM.jpg

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:SHIRELIVE AUDITORIUM.jpg, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.shirelive.com/index.php/services-locations. As a copyright violation, File:SHIRELIVE AUDITORIUM.jpg appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:SHIRELIVE AUDITORIUM.jpg has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at File talk:SHIRELIVE AUDITORIUM.jpg and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) and CC-BY-SA, under CC-BY-SA, or released into the public domain leave a note at File talk:SHIRELIVE AUDITORIUM.jpg with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on File talk:SHIRELIVE AUDITORIUM.jpg.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 08:01, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Shirelive auditorium full.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Shirelive auditorium full.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 08:07, 8 September 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 08:07, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

File:Shirelive auditorium full.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Shirelive auditorium full.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 08:07, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Bidgee (talk) 08:07, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Shirelive auditorium full.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Shirelive auditorium full.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. ww2censor (talk) 15:58, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Shirelive_auditorium_full.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Shirelive_auditorium_full.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Closedmouth (talk) 16:13, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Shirelive auditorium full.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Shirelive auditorium full.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Bidgee (talk) 23:02, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

Problems with upload of File:Wiki Logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Wiki Logo.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:06, 7 October 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Shirelive Logo.gif

The file File:Shirelive Logo.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 11:17, 25 December 2018 (UTC)