Burrild, you are invited to the Teahouse

edit
 

Hi Burrild! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Osarius (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:15, 24 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Reactor1967

edit
 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Rankersbo (talk) 13:29, 24 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Reactor1967

edit

Hello Burrild,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Reactor1967 for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Ishdarian 19:11, 6 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

 
Hello, Burrild. You have new messages at Ishdarian's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time.

Ishdarian 20:36, 6 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Reactor1967

edit

Hi Burrild, I've deleted the article Reactor1967, as well as your sandbox. This page is not factual, and appears to be a hoax. It isn't appropriate to include on Wikipedia, because Wikipedia is not a free webhost. There are other websites that do provide free hosting for your own content, including fictional content that you may want to try out. Please don't add this information back to Wikipedia though, as it does not fit in with the mission of this site. Please let me know if you have any questions. Prodego talk 20:49, 6 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

And it appears again my sources were not read because there was a news paper article as well as my other sources from news outlets. Also, in the live chat which I have a copy of you guys said you would leave my sandbox along. It appears you guys are lieing to me and you may see our chat logs and communications is a letter to the editor in a very well known public news paper with lots of readers. And, else where. I dont like being lied to. You guys said you would leave my sandbox along. Please respond. burrild

Your recent edits

edit

  Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (  or  ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:42, 6 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

June 2013

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for attempting to harass other users. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  ... discospinster talk 22:08, 6 June 2013 (UTC)Reply