Buu206

Welcome to Wikipedia

Welcome!

Hello, Buu206, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! . dave souza, talk 08:19, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Global warming controversy

Thanks for your edit to Global warming controversy which I've undone as it broke a useful link with no improvement in neutrality as far as I could see: note that WP:NPOV requires giving due weight to clear majority views, and not giving "equal validity" to minority or fringe views. The wording can doubtless be improved, subject to keeping these points in mind, but the link to Scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming is useful and should not be removed. . . dave souza, talk 08:19, 3 July 2010 (UTC)

Three-revert rule

Hi Buu206 - as a new editor here, you are probably unaware of Wikipedia's "Three-revert rule". Basically, it states that you can't make more than 3 reverts to the same article in any 24-hour period, and that's the point you're at right now over at the Global warming controversy article. One of the ideas behind 3RR is that if other editors disagree with you, maybe you should step back and check out exactly what is at stake. Don't take it personally, 'cos many of us have been at 3RR ourselves and we realise it's easy to get there, but experience helps take the heat off. Enjoy your editing! --Technopat (talk) 17:59, 3 July 2010 (UTC)