Bww3

This is Bww3's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Raloh Raitt (April 1)

Latest comment: 7 months ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Killarnee was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Raloh Raitt and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Killarnee (talk) 10:26, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Bww3! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Killarnee (talk) 10:26, 1 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Raloh Raitt

Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, Bww3. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Raloh Raitt, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:07, 1 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Protectors of Pine Oak Woods has been accepted

Latest comment: 2 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Protectors of Pine Oak Woods, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Dr vulpes (Talk) 01:53, 17 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Peter J. Morin

Latest comment: 1 month ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi there. I updated some information to the article you started on Peter J. Morin, and wondered if you were aware of resources like the Internet Archive? They are an invaluable resource. There's also Google Newspapers and what they're calling the Wikipedia Reference Search.

Be careful when Googling, though - you need to put some parameters on the name. There's a neurologist in Maine (I think) and a lawyer in Wisconsin that also come up if you just search by name. And old obituaries if you dig far enough back.

If you're looking directly for someone's research, you can always check out the links in their Wikidata file, if they have one. Morin does - it's here. "Identifiers" can help lead to their research papers, especially Google Scholar, ORCID, Research ID, and ResearchGate.

Though, if you haven't already read it, taking a look at WP:RS is always a good idea. His CV is great for giving things to look up, but it can't be cited itself. Though it is how I knew to look for the George Mercer Award, I admit.

Happy editing! OIM20 (talk) 07:51, 19 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic