Welcome!

edit
 
Welcome!

Hello, Bxrxbx, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Googleguy007 (talk) 14:50, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello Wikipedia!

edit

Bxrxbx (talk) 14:57, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Samheng Bora has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Samheng Bora. Thanks! Qcne (talk) 12:41, 16 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
I have followed your comments. Thanks for your guidance. Bxrxbx (talk) 17:53, 16 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Samheng Bora has been accepted

edit
 
Samheng Bora, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Qcne (talk) 20:11, 16 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hello @Qcne I have added more information about his early life, career, and personal life with references and sources. Please help check. thanks. Bxrxbx (talk) 09:06, 17 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ith Samheng has been accepted

edit
 
Ith Samheng, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Qcne (talk) 16:22, 17 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for approving. I will try to add more information. Bxrxbx (talk) 16:25, 17 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pleng Chan has been accepted

edit
 
Pleng Chan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 12:51, 5 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for accepting my writing. Thank you so much. Bxrxbx (talk) 06:29, 6 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hello, @EmeraldRange Can you help me check why the page Pleng Chan you have approved was deleted? I tried to add some more information from reliable sources. Please kindly let me know how I can edit my writing style or something to make it more neutral since English is not my mother tongue. Thanks. Bxrxbx (talk) 16:11, 1 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
It looks like someone else thought the content was too promotional. They thought the article. See the link below on G11 criteria. I can't read it or suggest changes, but you may contact the administrator who deleted to contest. EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 22:10, 1 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your guiding. I will contact them. Bxrxbx (talk) 07:56, 2 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hello @EmeraldRange I have contacted the admin and I have learned from his guidance. Now I would like to write the article for review once again. Could you help check if it is from a neutral point of view? I hope I can do it better this time since English is my second language. Thanks for your kindness. Bxrxbx (talk) 14:45, 9 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hello @EmeraldRange, Sorry to mention you but there is no one reviewing my draft. I was wondering if you could help check the draft again. Could you kindly let me know if the way of my writing is from a neutral point of view with my choice of words? I wish to learn about this and move on to more. Sending regards and love. Bxrxbx (talk) 15:53, 14 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hello @EmeraldRange, Sorry to mention you again but there is no one reviewing my draft. I was wondering if you could help check the draft again. Could you kindly let me know if the way of my writing is from a neutral point of view with my choice of words? I wish to learn about this and move on to more. Sending regards and love. Bxrxbx (talk) 16:01, 21 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
I'd prefer another editor review your article. I think the general issue may be that it is run-of-the-mill. While there are certainly sources and details, I'm not sure if the restaurant is unique enough. Run-of-the-mill (WP:MILL) isn't an official wikipedia policy, but you might want to emphasize why this company is different and important as many coffee shops do things to help the community and sell coffee. Wikipedia can't have articles for every coffee shop that exists or even for every coffee shop ever visited by the United States Secretary of State or every coffee shop using traditional cups as there are thousands or millions of them. EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 20:16, 24 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks @EmeraldRange for your comment. I will wait for other editors to have opinions on this. Really appreciate and respect your guidance. Thanks. Bxrxbx (talk) 09:07, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply


Your submission at Articles for creation: Samheng Boros has been accepted

edit
 
Samheng Boros, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Qcne (talk) 16:24, 9 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pleng Chan (March 6)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MicrobiologyMarcus was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
microbiologyMarcus [petri dish·growths] 20:59, 6 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Bxrxbx! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! microbiologyMarcus [petri dish·growths] 20:59, 6 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pleng Chan (July 24)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CFA was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
C F A 💬 22:19, 24 July 2024 (UTC)Reply