User talk:Byteflush/Archive 1

Archive 1

Archive 2

 

Welcome, from Journalist

Welcome!

Hello, Byteflush/Archive 1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Journalist (talk • contribs)

wikipedians

Hello, i saw you were listed on the Wikipedia:List of drug-free Wikipedians, but as one of the funny ones, and i invite you to read this and add your name or something else if you want. You may also want to put your name here: category:wikipedians by fields of interest under drugs/drug addiction. cheers! --Ballchef 13:13, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

Untagged image

An image you uploaded, Image:GrbSombora.gif, was tagged with the {{coatofarms}} copyright tag. This tag was deleted because it does not actually specify the copyright status of the image. The image may need a more accurate copyright tag, or it may need to be deleted. If the image portrays a seal or emblem, it should be tagged as {{seal}}. If you have any questions, ask them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. -- 15:11, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

September 2016

Hello, I'm Robert McClenon. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Talk: Mother Teresa without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please do not remove content from talk pages except in special cases. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:41, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

For anyone looking at this page, I will just paste a message I wrote on Robert's wall talk page (didn't receive a reply). No big deal, of course, but just to be clear that it wasn't vandalism.

Hi Robert. I was trying to fix the talk page since some contributors messed up the formatting and duplicated a part of a section. You reverted my edit https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Mother_Teresa&diff=prev&oldid=737757832 but I was only removing duplicate text and some markup that may have messed up the page. I may have missed something -- if I did, I apologize -- but it seems more like a false positive to me. :) BytEfLUSh | Talk! 21:46, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, BytEfLUSh. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

Why I decided to promoted Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki to Featured Article Status

It is very complete and deserves reassessment. Besides it could be a great TFA for august 6 and august 9. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eltomas2003 (talk • contribs) 21:03, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

WP:HOUND

Please stop with this type of harrasment. I did not delete anything, yo did it!--Taribuk (talk) 07:03, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

@Taribuk: That... does not make any sense. Diffs, please? BytEfLUSh | Talk 07:05, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

TonyBallioni (talk) 14:34, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

January 2018

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page List of serial killers in the United States has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 00:10, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

@Loriendrew: Yeah, sorry about that. I accidentally accepted a version that should have been rejected, that's why I wrote oops, my bad in the edit summary as I reverted the edit. Only a minute later I found the "Unaccept" button, but can't change edit summaries afterwards. BytEfLUSh ^Talk 00:19, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

There's actually something you can use for that! See Help:Dummy edit. It is for dummies like us who do dummyish things.--☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 00:47, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Ah, didn't know about that. Thank you; I hope I won't have to use it too often, though. =) BytEfLUSh ^Talk 00:52, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Rollback granted

Hi BytEfLUSh. After reviewing your request for "rollbacker", I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

If you no longer want rollback, contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see Wikipedia:Administrators' guide/Rollback (even though you're not an admin). I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, but feel free to leave me a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Thank you for helping to reduce vandalism. Happy editing! Mz7 (talk) 07:20, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Miss Universe 2018 Pending

Hey could you open Miss Universe 2018 pending system? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hearmesir (talk • contribs) 09:31, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I was away from computer at the time, it looks like someone else reviewed the edits. BytEfLUSh ^Talk 21:41, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

FYI

Hi BytEfLUSh! I noticed that your current configuration of Huggle isn't adding any summary to the reverts that it makes within the article space. Did you modify any settings that would remove the summary it adds when it reverts the changes made? Figured I'd let you know; usually Huggle adds a rollback summary. Cheers, and thanks a bunch for your time patrolling recent changes! :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:05, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

@Oshwah: Thank you for notifying me about the problem. I didn't change any settings, though I'll look it up now (I usually revert with Q when notifying the user/IP and R otherwise). Thank you for your anti-vandalism work, too. Usually as I'm about to revert, I notice that the edit has already been reverted by you. =) BytEfLUSh ^Talk 05:09, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

I use the 'Q' key as well. Just make sure you didn't accidentally modify any settings that might remove the edit summary text used. It's weird; I haven't seen that before, but I wouldn't be surprised if there was a setting that would let you modify the edit summary left. You might also look at your huggle3.css file as well (even though I doubt that something like that would be there). Let me know if you need help, and I'll be happy to do so. Cheers - ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:12, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

I tried to find the appropriate setting, but couldn't locate anything similar. Also, it looks like I don't have a huggle3.css file in my user space. Weird. I have to go now, I'll try again later, I must have missed something. Thank you for your help, if I don't manage to find the setting I'll try asking on Huggle talk page, or if it's ok with you - ask you for assistance. BytEfLUSh ^Talk 05:30, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

Nevermind, I'm an idiot, didn't allow the bot account to edit my user space. =) It should be fixed now, though I think I'll test it later. BytEfLUSh ^Talk 05:55, 17 January 2018 (UTC)

(Personal attack removed)

oi (Personal attack removed) whyd u remove me fucken post about launie? do you even know shit about tassie???Smartman777 (talk) 05:05, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

fuck youSmartman777 (talk) 05:07, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi Smartman777! Welcome to Wikipedia! I highly recommend that you go through and complete Wikipedia's new user tutorial - It will help you by guiding you through the interface, showing you our rules and guidelines and where to find them, and help you with how to message other users. It will also show you how to find and add references. If you have any questions, let me know. Welcome aboard! BytEfLUSh ^Talk 05:29, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

yeah shut the fuck up (Personal attack removed)Smartman777 (talk) 05:35, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Asgardia

you just removed my post on asgardia, it was not experimental, it was a warning so that future asgardians would not face unjust banishment as I did - one was enough a test, and most of the current polititcians saw it — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.47.104.210 (talk) 06:29, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I'm not claiming that your edits were not true, but anything that you add to Wikipedia must be supported by reliable sources. Also, the tone of your edit is not neutral. I understand your concerns, but we're building an encyclopedia, not a warning system. If you have any more questions, feel free to contact me on this page. BytEfLUSh ^Talk 06:33, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

P.S. May I suggest you start a new section on Asgardia talk page? Perhaps other editors can help you in finding reliable sources and rewording the text you want to add to the article. BytEfLUSh ^Talk 06:39, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

BP?

Nobody knows what BP. is. Use AD, BC, or BCE, CE. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2606:A000:82CA:4500:9509:5E9F:1B97:507A (talk) 05:36, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Oh... Sorry about that, my mistake. I thought you changed it from 5000 BP to 3000 AD. And also, I made the same mistake twice, it seems. :-\ Feel free to change it again, as far as I'm concerned. Actually, since I reverted your edits which clearly weren't vandalism, I self-reverted to your version. My apologies once again, and thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. BytEfLUSh ^Talk 05:45, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Your signature is awesome.

Just had to say it. The code is so complicated I don't even want to try to figure that out... Gatemansgc (TɅ̊LK) 23:24, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

@Gatemansgc: Thank you!! I'm very glad you like it! The code has been compressed a bit in order to fit the signature limit. I'm preparing a step-by-step explanation, will post it soon (within an hour or so) here, so you (or anyone that wants to) can play around with it. =) BytEfLUSh _Talk 23:45, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

[[User:BytEfLUSh|<b style="font-family:courier;box-shadow:2px 1px 4px #aaa;border:1px solid #ccc;padding:0 6px;background:linear-gradient(#fff,#ddd);color:#071;border-radius:6px">BytEfLUSh</b>]] <sub style="margin:0 2px">[[User talk:BytEfLUSh|Talk]]</sub>

That's the full signature value from Preferences, but I'll only be explaining the bolded part (I think the rest is more/less clear). =)

• <b> tag is used to bold the font (well, also because it saves space).
  
• font-family:courier is pretty straightforward - use Courier font for the text.
  
• box-shadow:2px 1px 4px #aaa is somewhat more difficult. The first value is horizontal offset of the shadow (positive value means to the right). Second value is vertical offset (positive means below). Third value is blur - so, the shadow is blurred over 4 pixels. #aaa is the shadow color (it's the same as #aaaaaa).
  
• border:1px solid #ccc defines a solid, one pixel border around the text with the RGB color #ccc (which is #cccccc).
  
• padding:0 6px here, first value is used for top and bottom padding, the second one is for the left and right padding. If I didn't define the 6px padding, the text would be stuck to the border.
  
• background:linear-gradient(#fff,#ddd) defines a gradient background inside the box. It goes from #fff (#ffffff, full white) to #ddd (#dddddd, very light grey), top to bottom.
  
• color:#071 defines font color, #071 is the same as #007711
  
• border-radius:6px means that the border of the box is rounded, with 6px as the radius. Hope this helps. =) BytEfLUSh _Talk 23:58, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Russia

Russia is occupied? By whom other than Russians? Seriously, what's going on here?~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.192.157.95 (talk) 22:26, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Please explain yourself. Why is Russia shown as occupied in the map?47.192.157.95 (talk) 22:32, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

I see that you raised the concern on the article's talk page. That's where it belongs - editing the article itself the way you did is not allowed. The map may be counter-intuitive, I agree, but it doesn't show Russia as occupied, but rather an occupying force. If you open the large version of the map and zoom in, you'll notice light green areas around Russia (Crimea, east Ukraine, etc.) - that's the occupied area. BytEfLUSh _Talk 22:34, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

No it's not! It doesn't show it as an occupying force but as occupied. It's right below the heading that says "Ongoing military occupations". And zooming in shows green and light green but no explanation what-so-ever as to what it means. Is this how Wikipedia is run? I'm quite stunned so far.47.192.157.95 (talk) 22:42, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

That's why I said the map is counter-intuitive since it also took me a few seconds to realize what's going on. It's not just Russia - same goes for other countries on the map - darker color for the occupying country, lighter one for the occupied area. Wikipedia is a collaborative effort of thousands of volunteers, and the way it's run is that volunteers are expected to improve the encyclopedia while following guidelines and rules. Editing the heading of a section to "Ongoing military occupations especially Russia which seems to be occupied by Wikipedia" is not constructive and does not improve the article. However, now that you know what is displayed on the map, you are free to add the explanation of the map underneath the image, that would be constructive. BytEfLUSh _Talk 22:50, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Presenting complete utter nonsense doesn't improve any site claimed to be an encyclopedia and you seem to be happy with having that nonsense in there as long as it looks proper? What's wrong here? I really don't understand your point in insisting on false information. Why don't you remove it?47.192.157.95 (talk) 22:56, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

I did not insert anything into that article, and as I said - feel free to add something like Darker colors show occupying countries, lighter colors show occupied area below the map. That way you would improve Wikipedia and prevent future misunderstandings. Also, I don't really care much about the map - I didn't create it and I didn't add it to the article. But changing section headings like that does not improve an article. BytEfLUSh _Talk 22:58, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

You did not insert that nonsense but you defended it. I guess I could try to remove the map myself but I'm still buffed as to why you removed my contribution while leaving the actual error in.47.192.157.95 (talk) 23:05, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

I removed the map of embarrassment and hope it'll stay out.47.192.157.95 (talk) 23:28, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

I see you've been reverted. I've added a link to this section to the article's talk page, but do continue your discussion there. As I said - I don't hold an opinion on this, so I won't interfere. BytEfLUSh _Talk 23:49, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

Tottenham

please let me change llorente's transfer fee to 12 mil; that's what he went for — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adzahoadzaho (talk • contribs) 04:27, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

@Adzahoadzaho: Sure, I won't stop you, just make sure to provide verifiable reliable sources. BytEfLUSh _Talk 05:03, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

@BytEfLUSh: idk how to edit the sources but it says it right here http://www.espn.com/soccer/soccer-transfers/story/3193407/tottenham-beat-chelsea-to-sign-swansea-city-striker-fernando-llorente — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adzahoadzaho (talk • contribs) 06:23, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

@Adzahoadzaho: You don't need to ping me if you're posting on my talk page -- I'll get the notification anyway. =) Also, please sign your comments by adding four tildes (~~~~) after your message. The source says: Llorente, who will cost around £12 million, sources said, has signed a two-year deal... so it doesn't look like it's an exact, official figure. My suggestion is to wait for more reliable sources to confirm the figure - there is no rush, we're not on a deadline, this is not a competition on who will be the first one to report some news. You may want to ask for more feedback on the talk page for Llorente's article. I'm just one editor - there may be others who disagree with my opinion, it's better to ask there. Just make sure you include your source.

Edit: Hmmm, just noticed that this was last year's summer transfer, I thought it happened during the winter transfer window. Not sure then, ask for more feedback on Llorente's talk page. I'm not an expert. BytEfLUSh _Talk 06:32, 1 February 2018 (UTC)

can you please stop them from changing it? yes there is no official confirmation but that is the case for almost all transfers and usually the reported and unofficial fee is listed on wikipedia so it is baffling why for some reason the site is being such a stickler over this one. i love cashews (talk) 09:23, 2 February 2018 (UTC)

@Adzahoadzaho: That's not how it works. I can't stop other editors from removing unverified information, even if I wanted to. I just took a look at your contribs, it seems that this (<- click) is the article in question. Please explain the changes you want to be made at the article's talk page (<- click) and see if you gain consensus. I'll link to this discussion on the talk page now, as a courtesy. Every comment from now on should be posted there, though. BytEfLUSh _Talk 00:31, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Revert

Hi,

Why did you revert your reversion? It was clearly vandalism . Adam9007 (talk) 04:17, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Hmmmm, I definitely didn't mean to do that, and I should've noticed. I'm really not sure what happened there, (hope I) probably saw some other diff; it happens with Huggle sometimes. Just a sec, let me check.

Update: It wasn't a HG revert, it was manual. I always check my contribs page to see if I made a mistake in a diff. If I reverted my anti-vandalism, that means I wanted to revert some other edit of mine. Thank you for pointing this out.

Ah, now I see it. It was in User space. I reverted it thinking it was main space. I'm not sure how rules go for User pages, so I reverted myself. BytEfLUSh _Talk 04:21, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Vandalism is vandalism, wherever it is. If someone adds something like that to one's userspace (expect their own), it is almost certainly vandalism. Adam9007 (talk) 04:32, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Good to know, thanks. I usually step away from User and Draft spaces, unless it's something obvious. Well, this should've been too, I guess. BytEfLUSh _Talk 04:34, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

@Adam9007: I guess I should reinstate the warning for the user, thought they will probably get to AIV soon anyway. Your opinion? Also, thank you for your reminder about the vandalism policy BytEfLUSh _Talk 04:39, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

WP:Vandalism has a section on user page vandalism. An edit like that is almost always unwelcome and illegitimate. By the way, fixing a ping like that doesn't work . Adam9007 (talk) 04:41, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Well, you're here, aren't you? So it works! =) Just kidding, I was always in a delusion that re-signing would make the ping work. Guess I was wrong. Thank you very much for your advice, I guess I won't screw up again. =) BytEfLUSh _Talk 04:45, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

I think pings only work if the software recognises what you've written as a new line. Merely editing an existing one doesn't work. Adam9007 (talk) 04:50, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Guess so. I thought re-rendering the page by adding ~~~~ would trigger that too (and I think I read something about that). Doesn't matter anyway, thank you very much for your help; I hope I'll be able to thread more carefully on my own in the Wiki labyrinth. =) BytEfLUSh _Talk 04:55, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Come on!

Come on mate, I was fighting vandalism! We seem to have a fair number of edit conflicts, and your mouse and keyboard always seems to be a tad faster than me. Zyc1174 (talk) 01:15, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

My apologies, but is this part of your diabolical plan? To make me reply to your message so you could revert more vandalism than me?? =D :grumble: well, it worked. =D BytEfLUSh _Talk 01:17, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

@Zyc1174: You didn't have to revert your entire edit on my talk page, you could've just removed {{ }}, that'd fix it. =) BytEfLUSh _Talk 02:52, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

In hindsight, yes. But at that time I didn't know what caused the edit, so it was safer to just revert everything. Anyways, I'd rather not some over-zealous editor slap a {{uw-vandal}} on my talkpage, ya know? :) Zyc1174 _chat? ^{what I did} 07:59, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

What do you think on mentioning Amiga as successor in Commodore 128?

By that I mean : Could we write Amiga 1000 (while specifying it as a different kind of computer) as a successor if by successor we are talking about Commodore computers? Do you see what I mean...? It seems more logical to me, personally. --Spafky (talk) 17:45, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

@Spafky: Well, I'd rather not put Amiga 1000 as a successor in the infobox. Maybe it'd be better to split the market performance section of the C128 article to add more info on future cancelled projects such as Commodore 900 and Commodore 65, as well as some brief overview of other Commodore projects (that is, Amiga) that eventually took over. This is just my opinion - maybe you should ask the community at C128 talk page for more feedback.

Edit: I just noticed it's been already briefly discussed there. BytEfLUSh _Talk 21:25, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

Kiara

I’m sorry but I was not ‘experimenting’ on Kiara. I was simply adding information that was not provided. CroissantOverlord (talk) 03:50, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

I was not ‘experimenting’ on “Kiara” I was simply adding information that had not been provided. I’m offended that you removed it. CroissantOverlord (talk) 03:54, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Kiara Skott does not seem to meet the Wikipedia notability guidelines. BytEfLUSh _Talk 03:57, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

Angelic (band)

{ hi I did changes to pages because it was showing the wrong information and it was mixing adult and kids content . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mariauranga1770 (talk • contribs) 04:27, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

@Mariauranga1770: Hi. The Angelic_(band) page doesn't look like it's about your daughter's band, but of another band with the same name. I strongly discourage you from creating a page about your daughter's band, as you have a conflict of interest. I suggest that you wait until someone else creates that article, which will undoubtedly happen if the band is notable by Wikipedia standards. byteflush _Talk 04:34, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Thanks/Sorry

Hi. I was just messing around when I added 'legend' to the Rainn Wilson article. I love him but I didn't mean to seem like an annoying anti-Wikipedia troll or anything. I was just playing, lol. Anyways, thank you for correcting it again and sorry for my actions. - Jon — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7F:2C47:1500:419E:DD3B:E9DF:AB8B (talk) 01:17, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

No worries about that, glad you read the notice and decided to stop. My revert doesn't mean I don't agree with you, but here we must maintain a neutral and encyclopedic point of view. You are welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, but all additions must be reliably sourced. Thank you for understanding the issue, and I hope to see productive editing from you in the future (though editing is, of course, on a voluntary basis). =) byteflush _Talk 01:23, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

revert

The comment you reverted was true, and indicated the condition that this participant "in notable lebanese people" is in despite him being a medical student and triumphing such conditions. I think it is important to highlight the condition to show how he overcame a difficult situation and achieved what most think he couldn't. Wasn't a troll addition. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.210.239.195 (talk • contribs) 05:19, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

You may be right, sorry if I jumped to conclusions too soon. However, it was an unsourced addition and after taking a closer look - it doesn't seem that the person even meets Wikipedia's notability guidelines for list inclusion. I've removed the entry from the list now. byteflush _Talk 04:26, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

A goat for you!

hello there it is I the man who said gay people PS. ur mom is gay

Andjewle (talk) 22:15, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Fucking stop

Change it back nerd freakin nurd — Preceding unsigned comment added by Piotxd (talk • contribs) 06:16, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Total hoe

This guys sucks and def doesn't get laid — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:246:4603:58B9:6991:3C14:AB91:EE82 (talk) 06:18, 14 February 2018 (UTC)

Revert

Yes it's ok I was just testing this function for a class. Sorry about that ! 74.15.217.93 (talk) 20:19, 14 February 2018 (UTC)Justinelacoste

Wrong press

Sorry, it was a slow internet for reverting, so I am apologize. --Cyrus noto3at bulaga (Talk to me) 01:53, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

No problem, that has happened to me a couple of times, too. =) byteflush _Talk 01:56, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Don't feed the trolls

Messages like these only antagonize and give them the belief that you're becoming defensive and that they're getting on your nerves - which is exactly what they want. Trolls want food, and their food is attention and seeing a reaction out out of you - don't feed them ;-). ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 10:14, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

@Oshwah: Yeah, I realize that, I was just about to remove my message. It gets annoying, though. I've seen it in real life, kids think that they somehow managed to get themselves an "admin account" since they can edit Wikipedia; and, they're l33t h4ck3rZ now... What's worst, those are smart kids, that may have become great editors... But their first instinct is to vandalize... byteflush _Talk 10:18, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Also, thank you for the message. I thought I was heading to AN/I for that. =) Message removed now. byteflush _Talk 10:25, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

No :-)... it's not something serious like that... why would I start an ANI over something I could just bring up to you casually here and help you with some light mentoring? lol. And I know it, man... and coming from someone whose done this for over 10 years now - trust me when I say that I completely understand. But giving into your frustrations and leaving messages like these do nothing but tell them that you have a limit when it comes to patience and keeping calm and professional, and that they're close to breaking that limit. It just motivates and thrives them to keep up what they're doing and troll more. AKA it feeds them (lol) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 10:28, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

@Oshwah: I envy you, taking all of those attacks light-heartedly. =) Thank you for your words, I knew those things before, but I get lost in anger sometimes, it's nice of you to remind me of that. NB: I'm not saying that I'm a split-personality or some awful cheesy excuse like that - I know some editors have tried that one already. No more troll-feeding from now on. Though, I like to keep their posts at my talk page; hope that's not against the rules (as long as no BLP issues are involved). =) I'm a weirdo. =P byteflush _Talk 10:59, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

Hahaha I get it man - it happens and nobody's perfect ;-). Just keep it in mind and you'll be absolutely fine. Mistakes are how we learn and grow here, and we're all expected to make them. Oh well... life moves on :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 11:01, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For continued anti-vandalism efforts, and from showing an eagerness to learn from mistakes. Keep up the good work - TNT❤ 11:23, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

@There'sNoTime: Thank you very much! Really appreciate it, and I hope I won't make many mistakes in the future. =) byteflush _Talk 11:19, 20 February 2018 (UTC)

Anti-Orthodoxy RM

You recently participated in an AfD discussion for the Anti-Orthodoxy article here. A request to move (retitle) that article is currently under discussion here if you'd care to participate. —  AjaxSmack  05:57, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

Get a real job

Get a real job — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1008:B142:C46B:35FE:15B5:80B5:A0F6 (talk) 22:01, 27 February 2018 (UTC)

Pathetic neckbeard

Get a real job. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.89.127.166 (talk) 04:16, 2 March 2018 (UTC)