CBCompton

Incomplete DYK nomination

Hello! Your submission of Template:Did you know nominations/Peer-to-Peer at the Did You Know nominations page is not complete; see step 3 of the nomination procedure. If you do not want to continue with the nomination, tag the nomination page with {{db-g7}}, or ask a DYK admin. Thank you. DYKHousekeepingBot (talk) 11:34, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Peer-to-Peer

Hello! Your submission of Peer-to-Peer at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! --Allen3 ^talk 12:01, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

Merging into Peer-to-peer

If you're going to pursue the merge proposal, then you should also put a notice at Talk:Social peer-to-peer processes, so that the contributors watching that article are notified as well. In fact, you can point those folks directly to the relevant discussion section by linking to Talk:Peer-to-peer#Social Peer-to-peer processes integration?. I'm not sure if it makes sense to merge the articles in general, but if you want to propose this, I think a basic thing to include in the proposal would be a breakdown of the sections in a new merged article.--Pharos (talk) 05:01, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

Thank you Pharos! After some discussion with the rest of our group and several other Wikipedia editors, we have decided to forgo merging the two articles, but we will reference the Social peer-to-peer processes article as suggested in the Peer-to-Peer talk page. CBCompton (talk) 20:24, 9 October 2013 (UTC)