Archive 15Archive 19Archive 20Archive 21Archive 22Archive 23Archive 25

18:07, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: November 2016





Headlines

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Wikidata weekly summary #239

19:30, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

usually people WP:BRD

so if you see your edit reverted.. discuss first before edit warring. 80.233.239.118 (talk) 15:00, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Göteborg's Högre Samskola listed at Redirects for discussion

 

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Göteborg's Högre Samskola. Since you had some involvement with the Göteborg's Högre Samskola redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Si Trew (talk) 15:34, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #240

20:33, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Great image

 
Paranasal sinuses

Fantastic work, just noticed it. Really great image, --Tom (LT) (talk) 08:52, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, but I had mis-tagged that one, hadn't made it myself. Working on far more take a look at Commons:Category:CNX Anatomy & Physiology. Carl Fredrik 💌 📧 09:12, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Irritable male syndrome

Hello. I've reverted your unilateral redirect of this article because it is cited and appears to have useful content. If this is unacceptable to you, I'd ask you take it to WP:AfD for resolution. Thank you. Praemonitus (talk) 22:43, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Your statements on my talkpage

Carl. I asked you to reconsider the bold and negative statements you made on my talkpage [12]. Sure if I made mistakes or did behave bad someone can tell me so, sometimes even hard words may be necessary. But this is unacceptable, as I wrote. Once again I ask you to substantiate or withdraw those statements. If, OTOH, you keep adding to the list of BF accusations, I may respond differently. -DePiep (talk) 08:28, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Psychoanalysis

I think it would be best if you left the hatting off the talk page. Edit warring to restore it (when you seem to be alone in wanting to restore it) is unprofitable and a diversion from the main task of improving the article. If you don't find the conversation you hatted to be helpful ignore it and start a more helpful thread. Kim Dent-Brown (Talk) 16:23, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 
Hi CFCF! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 15:42, Sunday, January 22, 2017 (UTC)

ShoutingBLP

Hi there CFCF. I am here in the spirit of goodwill. Its about WP:BLP - blp is not a cut and dried written down policy, it is more of an understanding of trust and care to the living people that we report about. We are encouraged to report on them conservatively and with caution. wp:due and wp:wellknown are available but are overridden by the basics of WP:BLP. Please try to look at it this way, it is irrelevant if you can find lots of weblinks that chit chat about something you want to or think should be added - its more that if you consider carefully the living person and his life from a respectful point of view you would not attempt to add that content even if there are weblinks which are reporting it. A biography is about the basic notable details of someones life, that is what WP:BLP is there to protect. The details in the press regarding all this speculation surrounding his mental health are nothing to do with his notable neutral biography/life story. Perhaps there is an article where such speculation may be worth a careful mention, the president article perhaps but in his wikipedia biography there is no place for it at all, under cautious wikipedia editing as we are requested to edit surrounding living people, there is no place at all and also no chance of inclusion. Your forceful desire to have it included in this living persons life story is not the way forward for the projects primary desire to protect living people. regards. Govindaharihari (talk) 19:54, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

trump

Please don't hide any of my posts or yours for that matter on the talkpage - ask an administrator if you have concerns - thanks Govindaharihari (talk) 19:55, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

That is not the way forward, see WP:CIVIL, WP:ADHOMINEM. I would only need to ask an adminstrator if I felt the issue was large enough that it should merit deleting your comment from the record. Carl Fredrik 💌 📧 19:57, 16 February 2017 (UTC)
as I said, ask an admin if you have concerns, don't start an edit war Govindaharihari (talk) 19:58, 16 February 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Steele dossier.png

 

Thanks for uploading File:Steele dossier.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 20:31, 18 February 2017 (UTC)