CGameProgrammer

Welcome, CGameProgrammer!

Hello Jasper Denney Welcome to Wikipedia! As nobody has welcomed you yet, I thought it only polite to do so myself. I just wanted to let you know that the article Definition of hybrid vehicle is the wrong place for that. Instead you should place the text in a user sub-page/sandbox. As a courtesy I have included the text of that article below. Here are a few useful links:

  The Five Pillars of Wikipedia

  How to edit a page

  Help pages

  Tutorial

  How to write a great article

  Manual of Style

  Fun stuff...

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~; this automatically adds your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!

➨ Green Giant 02:30, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

This is a placeholder created out of desperation since the Hybrid vehicle article's discussion was clogged with arguments on what constitutes a hybrid, and particularly on what a series hybrid is.

HowStuffWorks.com states simply, "Any vehicle that combines two or more sources of power that can directly or indirectly provide propulsion power is a hybrid."

Possible original sources of power include:

• Fuel
  • Gasoline
  • Diesel
  • Hydrogen

• Electricity
  • Solar power
  • Regenerative braking
  • Plug-in charging

Most people, including HowStuffWorks.com, are of the opinion that traditional diesel-electric locomotives are hybrids. But arguably their power comes solely from one source: diesel fuel. It's used to spin a generator to feed electricity to electric motors that propel the locomotive. The question is whether or not the generator or electric motors constitute a power source.

Definition of hybrid vehicle

copied from User talk:Green Giant
I created the titular article as a repository for all the comments on Hybrid vehicle that degenerated into arguments on what one was. The comment page was huge for that article, and despite being a Wikinewbie, I thought it best to move it elsewhere. Thoughts? CGameProgrammer 02:34, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

I understand, sometimes editors lose sight of the original purpose of Wikipedia. The best place for he text however is either on the Hybrid vehicle talkpage or on a user subpage. You can create a subpage for your userspace by editing the userpage -> [1] and then typing in the following -> [[/Hybrid vehicle]]. Save your userpage and you should have a redlink which you should click. It opens a blank page to which you can post the above material and then save the page. It will be linked directly to your userpage. Green Giant 02:41, 29 April 2006 (UTC)

Weird Science (TV series)

Just to let you know... Me, him, and some other people have been through a similar edit war over the Controversy section concerning this one Star Trek: Enterprise storyline called the Temporal Cold War. If this unfortunately keeps up (his name is Yaron, I think..), I guess it may prove worthy enough a mention in Lamest edit wars. DrWho42 21:36, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Perhaps the problem, then, is with (one of) you. I've never been in such an edit war before; I've never even seen one like this. Every other TV show I've looked up has been written very professionally. I will not stop removing the bullshit from the Weird Science article. CGameProgrammer 22:23, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Well, for the last one, User:MikeJ9919 had to RfC it since Yaron would not move from his position.. That did the trick in keeping Yaron's comments about "sophistication" gone.. DrWho42 23:02, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

Yeah I noticed. I'm sure we'll have to do that again for WS. CGameProgrammer 23:03, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

To merge the article of Honda Civic hybrid into Honda Civic

Hi. I just noticed from the discussion page of Honda Civic Hybrid that you had participated in previous discussion of merging the article of Civic hybrid into that of Civic. Currently, there's a renewed similar discussion here. Please feel free to drop a line. ---North wiki (talk) 18:53, 19 January 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, CGameProgrammer. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)