CRVielguth
|
March 2014
editHello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Applied Communication Sciences may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- work=TIA|accessdate=2012-02-29}}</ref> ATIS 3GPP Individual Members|work=ATIS|accessdate=2012-02-29}}</ref> ETSI, OIF, Open Mobile Alliance, and related industry organizations.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:39, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Vencore Labs
editIf this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Vencore Labs, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
- It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DGG ( talk ) 22:15, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
- Hi CRVielguth, I recommend reading Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) and Wikipedia:Notability#General_notability_guideline. The page as it stood, did not qualify. In the first instance, find and list some examples of where it is discussed in detail in independent sources below and we can then figure out how to proceed. Regards, Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 19:35, 4 September 2015 (UTC)