CRedit 1234
Welcome
editWelcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.
If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.
Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...
Finding your way around:
Need help?
|
|
How you can help:
|
|
Additional tips...
|
- Thanks. - CRedit 1234 (talk) 14:14, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
April 2010
editWelcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Washington International University, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This is particularly important when adding or changing any facts or figures and helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.TallMagic (talk) 17:09, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
- Umm, I did include sources. Are you and Orlady working as a tag-team? - CRedit 1234 (talk) 17:57, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
editYour name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Glasscity09 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Orlady (talk) 20:31, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
Indefinitely blocked
editYou may contest this block by adding the text
{{unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.This includes your attempt to out someone as well as badgering and harassing others. –MuZemike 18:37, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
- Not really requesting an unblock, because I'm not sure there's any point to continue editing Wikipedia, if the "winners" in disputes are the ones who are pushing a years-long agenda and manipulating content so that it reads as defamatory as possible, without any corroborating documentation besides Archive.org/Oregon website; and the "losers" are those who do all the hard work to expose the manipulators who are themselves socking, themselves lying. I merely hope that one of the other editors operating in the right will bring this tag-team to the Administrators Noticeboard, because the chicanery needs to stop. -- CRedit 1234 (talk) 20:25, 3 April 2010 (UTC)