Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 9)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 78.26 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 15:30, 9 January 2015 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Cafezz Music, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 15:30, 9 January 2015 (UTC)Reply


Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 9)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.

78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 15:31, 9 January 2015 (UTC)Reply


Cafezz Music Article for Creation

edit

Hello! There are a couple more issues regarding the article. While you may be the author of the CDBaby prose, it is very difficult for Wikipedia to confirm this. You may place a notice on the CDBaby site that states "you are free to copy information on this page". However, CDBaby may consider all material on its site copyright, so that may not suffice. Much better to re-write the information for Wikipedia. There is another problem: Notability. The CDBaby site is not independent of the subject, because it sell's the artists' music, and because most content on CDBaby is artist-generated. Please see the general notability guidelines and the music notability guidelines. In short, are multiple sources, independent of the subject, giving in-depth coverage of the subject? I hope that helps. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 16:13, 9 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Hi! can I use my own site to confirm the text? Its on http://www.musicaparafiestas.com/cafezz/s_nosotros_ingles.htmlCafezz Music (talk) 16:51, 9 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Perhaps, but you'd have to prove you have right to use that text, and CDBaby still might assert the text is part of their copyright site. It does not address to notability issue, your site is very much not independent of the subject. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 17:24, 9 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks so much for your quick responses. Can I then cite cdbaby? I really like the text the way it came out :DCafezz Music (talk) 18:05, 9 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

It's a weak source. You can cite it (as opposed to copying), but it really won't help get your article approved for mainspace exposure. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 18:42, 9 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! I'll rewrite. Cafezz Music (talk) 19:20, 9 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Music & Friends (album) has been accepted

edit
 
Music & Friends (album), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 11:52, 10 January 2015 (UTC)Reply