Calcuttan
Welcome
edit
|
Talkback
editMessage added 13:13, 26 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
September 2012
editYou are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ruderow. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 12:08, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
- I will be filing a report using the redlinked page above later today when I am able to use my laptop rather than my mobile phone. - Sitush (talk) 12:16, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
Please note that I am an independent editor altogether. If I revert your reverts in order to boost another's editor's morale, simply because I believe he is trying to improve the quality of the article, does not mean I am the same individual. Please don't assume so easily. And, I would like to request you to please contribute positively, instead of hanging on to an outdated version. Lets make the article better and more acceptable together. Calcuttan (talk) 14:24, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
- We do not change articles to boost someone's morale. Please self-revert and - if you really are not socking - contribute to the discussion on the talk page, where a thread has recently been opened. - Sitush (talk) 14:34, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
editThis account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Ruderow (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Reaper Eternal (talk) 14:40, 24 September 2012 (UTC) |
Calcuttan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Please note that I am an independent editor, and my contribution on Kulin Kayastha Talk Page (Section 3. Stating the facts) dated 10th March 2012 regarding disputes is posted much before user Ruderow started contributing. In this case I had reverted to last version by Ruderow, simply because I believe he is trying to improve the quality of the article. And, I would like to edit/contribute to this article independently as well. I would like to request all editors to please contribute positively, instead of hanging on to an outdated version and indulging in tactical vandalism under the garb of policies. Lets make the article better and more acceptable together. You may agree or disagree with me, but definitely, I am not a sockpuppet for Ruderow. Kindly remove this ban. Calcuttan (talk) 17:32, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
It's incredibly obvious who you are; if you want an unblock, go request it on Ruderow. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 04:22, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Calcuttan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This is my last request to unblock this user. I have contributed twice in the Kulin Kayastha Talk Page, including the one titled 'Resolution of Dispute through Discussions - Kind Attention Administrators', and any lay man can make out from my distinctive writing style who I am. Still, if this is the level of understanding of the respectable administrators of a platform like Wikipedia, I will leave it at that. Regards. Calcuttan (talk) 04:42, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Talk page access revoked. T. Canens (talk) 04:46, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Eh? Ruderow created the Kulin Kayastha article in October 2011. - Sitush (talk) 17:45, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
I was not aware. Anyways, you can well understand that I am not a proxy for Ruderow. We may disagree on any issue, blocking a user is not the way to sort it out. Calcuttan (talk) 04:06, 25 September 2012 (UTC)