Cali1155

Nomination of Black Rose Anarchist Federation for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Black Rose Anarchist Federation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Rose Anarchist Federation until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Huon (talk) 22:51, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Re: your comment at the discussion (it would be off-topic there)—Yep, there's plenty of other articles that also do not have significant coverage (?) and should eventually be put up for deletion. I write in this topic area, so I know the org articles you mention. As for the purpose of Wikipedia, it's an encyclopedia (a tertiary source that paraphrases reliable, secondary sources), though quality standards do not always/consistently reach to its extremities. The question is whether you can do justice to a topic with a given set of reliable, secondary sources. Right now, it looks like the best option is to expand as appropriate in anarchism in the United States. As for the resource/archive you'd like to see, when content doesn't fit into Wikipedia, we recommend taking it to another open wiki with an appropriate scope. Not sure what happened to Anarchopedia, but it would have fit the bill. Hope to see you around, czar 04:56, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Cali1155, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Cali1155! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 22:03, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Reliable sources

Re: [1] Wikipedia isn't a reliable source, as it's written by users and has no reputation for accuracy or fact-checking nor pedigree for editorial credibility (such as newspapers, magazines). czar 03:21, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the tip Czar! Cali1155 (talk) 15:40, 29 June 2017 (UTC)