CallAng222

Welcome!

Hello, CallAng222, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! Valfontis (talk) 15:13, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Linking dates

Hi, we no longer link individual years in articles. Thanks! Valfontis (talk) 15:14, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Islam

Please do not revert again. If you do, you'll join Slooppouts34 here. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 20:20, 21 January 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:CallAng222 reported by User:NeilN (Result: ). Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 01:00, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

It appears you have broken WP:3RR at Islam. There may still be time for you to respond to this complaint and promise to stop warring. Otherwise a block is possible. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 01:12, 22 January 2015 (UTC)

I've reverted twice to your position, and am myself barred from doing it again because of WP:3RR. So I have reverted your last edit even though I agree with it. In the meantime, I've posted a request for comment on Talk:Islam, in the hope that we can get some other editors to weigh in and develop a true consensus. In the meantime, please don't revert to your version again, or I'll have to block you. NawlinWiki (talk) 22:04, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

POV deletion

Please do not delete reliably sourced content from articles, as you did with the article on Islam. Do you have access to reliable sources that show a different point of view? Blogs, self-published websites, etc. do not count as reliable sources - see WP:RS. The aim of Wikipedia is to build up an encyclopaedia - so if you are are able to use reliable sources to show other views on the subject, then you are welcome to contribute.

I suggest you read Wikipedia:I just don't like it.-- Toddy1 (talk) 07:54, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Although I know for sure that you are a sockpuppet, and the SPI you filed secretly will only get you boomeranged. I enjoy your opposing views, and will not file a SPI to get you blocked. If you want to avoid getting blocked, revoke your SPI.--Slooppouts34 (talk) 03:06, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

The SPI

That has taken a lot of load off my head. I never fathomed that they were socks, just thought them as SPAs. --Fauzan^{✆ talk}_{✉ mail} 09:25, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for getting the SPI regarding (what should I put in brackets the guy has so many names) underway. I presume that he is somehow linked to mangoeater but cant prove that for sure so bleh there. Anyway, I would like to thank you from the bottom of my heart for getting theat sort of vandalizm off wikipedia. tyvvm.FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 15:09, 13 March 2015 (UTC)