Callisterp

Proposed deletion of Market for loyalties theory

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Market for loyalties theory, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Apparent original research, even signed by the author.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.  Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 22:27, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

I believe this an old criticism. The initial post has been expanded upon to explain the theory of Market for Loyalties Theory. The article cites twelve sources--two are the original authors, but the rest are from other scholars and sources.

Thanks much

Thank you for joining WP:WikiProject Freedom of speech !!! — Cirt (talk) 04:24, 5 January 2013 (UTC)