CalvinNelson4

Poker Face by Lady Gaga

Wikipedia are stupid. I had a website about certifications and information about Lady Gaga's wikipedia poker face page and they took it off. What's wrong with Wikipedia! I am really livid.

Just Dance

Donot add your original research in articles which are already GA like you did to the sales and certification of "Just Dance". Doing so you are violating Wikipedia's verifiability policy. I suggest you go through policies like WP:RS, WP:NOR and WP:VERIFIABILITY. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 04:31, 27 May 2009 (UTC)

Reply from CalvinNelson4

• I apologise for this but every time to add information it's always gets deleted I'm not the type of guy who would unreliable sources on these pages. I should be trusted.

• Also I did put references on certification of Just Dance and you still deleted it.

Boom Boom Pow

Do not remove citation tags without first providing a reliable source, as you did to Boom Boom Pow. Sales certifications need to be sourced. Thanks. - eo (talk) 14:52, 17 June 2009 (UTC)

Sweet 7

Your choice to describe new bandmember Jade Ewen as a chav was not acceptable. First of all she is not a chav and second of all wikipedians/editors are supposed to be impartial and report the facts. If this is something which you feel you should stop editing. Such bias comments constitute vandalism and could lead to being banned from editing. (Lil-unique1 (talk) 22:19, 21 September 2009 (UTC))_

Woah! you need to calm down and mind your language. The user talk page is there to address issues, if you dont want editors like myself to come on here to criticise your editing then do not edit in a controversial way and do not vandalise pages. I have as much right as anyone else to comment on your edits. You should consider yourself lucky that i didnt use an official warning template and alert wiki-administrators. Furthermore no page is your own other than your user home page. Therefore anyone and everyone else is free to edit articles relating to the sugababes. No one is allowed to take ownership of a particular article on wikipedia as this goes against the community. in future if you make any more comments with a hint of profanity or if you speak to myself or another member of the wikipedia community like you have done (using words like chav or the comment you left on my page) i notify wikipedia administrators. remember be critical of the edits and not the editor. (Lil-unique1 (talk) 13:04, 2 October 2009 (UTC))

I haven't spoken to you in a disrespectful manner and not once have i said that your are not a worthwhile editor, i merely pointed out that if you are going to edit make sure they are constructive. Calling someone a chav is the type of editing that will get you banned. if that is what you want fine, but whatever frustrations you have dont take them out on me. i should have just reported you for vadalising the article instead of trying to be constructive and asking you to refrain from such edits in the future. Jeeze you try to do people a favour and they throw it back in your face. (Lil-unique1 (talk) 15:04, 3 October 2009 (UTC))

Alexandra Burke Vs. Robbie Williams

In the United Kingdom these two are major artists. The songs their songs Bad Boys and Bodies on this weekend on the t.v sensation X-Factor. Also not only that but their songs are going battle for the number one spot because they are released. So who will you be buying?

Rated R (Rihanna album) genre consensus

Do u care 2 contribute to the genre issue at the article's talk page? Dan56 (talk) 07:01, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

January 2010

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Telephone (song). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 05:31, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

March 2010

Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Rihanna discography. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 09:06, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rihanna discography, you will be blocked from editing. Your insistence on inserting incorrect information is not helped by your unwillingness to use an edit summary. Please try to make your edits constructive ones. — JohnFromPinckney (talk) 09:13, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

New Routemaster

Read the damn edit summary. Bgwhite (talk) 09:15, 29 September 2015 (UTC)

October 2015

Your recent editing history at New Routemaster shows that you have been engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Although you had the edit war on this page a few days ago, i am sending you this warning to warn you not to do it again or you could end up being reported by another user and ending up being blocked from editing. Class455fan1 (talk) 12:36, 4 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

March 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at New Routemaster, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jeni ^(talk) 08:57, 17 March 2016 (UTC)

Apologies about that. I have added references to back this information up now. I know how important and reliable information has to be here. ^{CalvinNelson4} 06:22, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, CalvinNelson4. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, CalvinNelson4. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)