User talk:CambridgeBayWeather/Archive01

Latest comment: 19 years ago by Evilphoenix in topic Your Rfa

DO NOT EDIT OR POST REPLIES TO THIS PAGE. THIS PAGE IS AN ARCHIVE.

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! Burgundavia (✈ take a flight?) 19:22, Jun 12, 2005 (UTC)

Nunavut airports

edit

Can you make this one box please? Burgundavia (✈ take a flight?) 19:28, Jun 12, 2005 (UTC)

Aircraft specifications survey

edit

Since you are a contributor to aviation articles, you may wish to take part in Wikipedia:WikiProject Aircraft/Specifications survey. Bobblewik 10:08, 23 July 2005 (UTC)Reply

I saw your further discussion on Bobblewik's talk page. I have argued that that voting limitation should not be there (Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aircraft#Procedural objections). But even with it, all it would mean is that any voting you make could be discounted, that doesn't preclude you from suggesting this yourself as well. Jump into the discussion, you can mention about not being able to vote for it. Gene Nygaard 13:00, 23 July 2005 (UTC)Reply

Aircraft Questions

edit

Loaded weight means exactly what it sounds like: the weight of the plane when loaded (with fuel, payload etc.). This is not a very useful number because the plane could be fully loaded, partially loaded or purposely empty and all these could be the "loaded weight". The correct thing to use would be Maximum gross take-off weight, which is set by the manufacturer.

Range is very subjective. Different stats are published depending on what they want to showcase. For example. The de Havilland Caribou's range is given as "with maximum payload and reserves", showing how far it can carry cargo, while the Bellanca Airbus's range is given with "maximum fuel" and no payload. I prefer the one with the fuel for ferry range, as "flight for range" is defined (for pilots) as an aircraft being flown for maximum range, with the objective being to fly the greatest distance possible per unit of fuel consumed.Trevor macinnis 15:26, 25 July 2005 (UTC)Reply

Thanks

edit

  Just thought I would say thanks for the good work you've been doing in illustrating weather station related pages. -- Solipsist 18:10, 1 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

ICAO aircraft designators

edit

I know you're on a mission to add aircraft designators to the articles, which is fine, but is there possibly a smoother way to integrate them? Just dropping in a single sentence at random, for example right after a line about "Canadian companies manufacturing new Beavers" that reads "The ICAO designation as used in flight plans is DHC2", is not exactly the slickest method. Perhaps somewhere in related content or at least maybe more integrated into the article? It's fine information to have, but it's gotta be included without standing out awkwardly. Maybe we can get some thoughts going at the wikiproject? Thanks in advance. -eric 07:36, 2 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

  Did you know? has been updated. A fact from the article Ceiling balloon, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently-created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Apple Store Stanford Shopping Center

edit

24.92.28.176

edit

I have listed this one on the vanadalism in progress page. He's editing too many articles. I get the feeling we are feeding the troll. CambridgeBayWeather 05:07, 24 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, I have that feeling, too. Thanks doing the vandalism report. >>sparkit|TALK<< 05:11, August 24, 2005 (UTC)
I left a message on his talk page and I think he's trolling on there too. I don't think I reply. CambridgeBayWeather 05:14, 24 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

Re: List of countries by infant mortality rate

edit

Thanks for reminding that the table's heading was missing. As for the differences, I'm not an expert in this field; but the source of the data is now provided clearly in List of countries by infant mortality rate (2005). After a little research, I believe that the figure of 284 for Sierra Leone is based on "under 5 mortality rates" (U5MR) (rate of children died before they turn 5 years old), whereas 162 is the standard mortality rates (under 1 years old). --Vsion 06:48, 24 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

Sara-Marie Fedele

edit

Ack, sorry about that. My America-centrism showing. Zoe 08:09, August 24, 2005 (UTC)

Squodge mcdodge

edit

_ _ I suggest you VfD this one (IMO, not a speedy) & muster yr info there. I know of EH only what i read on a talk page that lks to Micheal Black, perhaps from a msg you left there, but watch for changes re EH, as i have not lost interest yet.
_ _ You may want to check What links here for SMcD: reverting the addition of those links could be the start of an edit war with the vandals, but you don't need to go thru VfD for an edit, so there's probably something you can do personally.
--Jerzyt 00:25, 2005 August 26 (UTC)

Out of town

edit

I'm out of town for a week. Back 02 September 2005. CambridgeBayWeather 12:38, 28 August 2005 (UTC) Returned CambridgeBayWeather 02:56, 3 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the heads up

edit

Thanks for the heads up on Pawel swiecicki, I've just deleted it again. -- Francs2000 | Talk   18:02, 28 August 2005 (UTC)Reply

Adaminaby

edit

I have removed your {{db}} because this place does exist, in Australia. -x42bn6 Talk 09:03, 3 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

Award

edit
 
I hereby award you the Exceptional Newcomer award for your help with new page patrol. --MarkSweep 15:20, 4 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

I noticed your edits while doing RC patrol. Thanks for flagging suspicious pages and keeping the vandals at bay. Especially the former is a thankless task, since your edits won't show up in the list of your contributions if the questionable pages are ultimately deleted. So, here's some well-earned recognition for your work. Cheers, --MarkSweep 15:20, 4 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

Baker v. Gordon

edit

Hello. US Court decisions are public documents. However, it is possible that the file I attached was DL from a commercial database. I don't remember who sent it to me and what the source was. Do you think this may pose a problem?

Praymantis

edit

Where did you find the copyright violation for praymantis? I couldn't locate it on Google. --NeilN 23:11, 5 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

[On insects world] Great, thanks. --NeilN 23:58, 5 September 2005 (UTC)Reply


Bridge article

edit

Hi! Sorry to have inconvenienced you. Thank you for letting me know. - Lucky 6.9 03:16, 6 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

Not at all. I saw that you'd recreated it..and I felt kind of bad to have pulled the trigger early. I'm as close as my talk page if you ever need a hand with something. - Lucky 6.9 04:20, 6 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

Framers (as per User talk:Soir)

edit

It is entirely possible that the term 'Framers' could be used for other things. I'll make a disambiguation page to show this. Thanks for pointing it out. -- Soir (say hi) 05:28, 6 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

That's not a problem. 'Framers' could also refer to the plural of 'framer', which is enough for at least an initial page. Any further disambiguations can be put upon it, at such future time as any are found out. -- Soir (say hi) 05:33, 6 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

M.C. Brown Shoes

edit

Thanks for all your help. :) M.C. Brown Shoes 10:23, 6 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

The Student Revolution novel

edit

Articles about books cannot possibly be speedies unless they have no content. Vanity/non-notable/etc criteria apply only to individual people. Instead, the article should be listed on AfD. Cheers --Ryan Delaney talk 10:12, 7 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

Thanks

edit

Your name is constantly popping up where ever i go labelling speedy deletes/copyvio stuff/reverting vandals etc. Thanks a lot!

I therefore think you would make a great Admin, however you probably need a bit more experience (at the moment you have less than 1000 edits) to "pass".

Please remind me to nominate you for adminship when you have closer to 2000 edits. thanks and keep up the good work! Martin - The non-blue non-moose 10:37, 8 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

I second that. The thing is, CBW has probably made a lot of edits that don't get counted: if you flag an image for deletion and it gets deleted, that edit isn't counted. Not that that should stop you from doing RC patrol, though. The situation could be clarified in any future admin nomination. --MarkSweep 11:41, 8 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

You'll enjoy being a "policeman" even more when you can delete/block/rollback. I would be happy to nominate you now if you wanted, but it wouldn't be a very clean promotion as some voters oppose unless you meet some magical level of time and edits (although mark does make a good point about your edit count). Martin - The non-blue non-moose 13:48, 8 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

Layman's terms or Leman's term?

edit

Well I checked from google searches and the searches here on wikipedia with no other spelling suggestions or redirections. On google it goes as Leman's terms which was on every search result.

SignalMan

Well...

edit

I heard of the Layman as "leman" from friends and certain movie quoates where the sound of an 'E' is mentioned in it.

~SignalMan

Demarest Hall

edit

Hey, I don't know where to put this, but I have copyright permission for the Demarest Hall wikipedia entry. I live with Enon Avital, the creator of the webpage, it's fine, email him here: dewfather@gmail.com

Or sabrina.vargas@gmail.com and khennessey@echo.rutgers.edu who I both work with as Culture Studies leader of Demarest Hall.

Opalescence

edit

Probably, opalescence deserves its own article. In the meantime, I redirected it to opal because that article includes the following: "The term opalescence is commonly and erroneously used to describe this unique and beautiful phenomenon, which is correctly termed play of color. Contrarily, opalescence is correctly applied to the milky, turbid appearance of common or potch opal. Potch does not show a play of color." If someone follows opalescence to opal they will at least find some discussion of the term there. Critical opalescence seems to be a very specific kind of opalescence, and probably not everything that links to opalescence should lead the reader to critical opalescence. There are only a handful of articles that link to opalescence anyway; if any of them should lead to critical opalescence maybe you could fix them so they do. --Angr/tɔk mi 00:34, 12 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

About double redirects

edit

Hi, I've been working on the double redirects project and I think I've finished my first section :-) Would you mind checking if I did it right? And am I right to assume that I can just ignore the red links if I can't make any sense out of them? I hope it's not too much trouble, if it is please let me know. Thanks! --JoanneB 15:15, 15 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! Nice to know I'm on the right track. Thanks for the hints on the red links, I'll see what I can find, some of them look pretty easy. --JoanneB 15:45, 15 September 2005 (UTC)Reply
Yeah, it's not too hard. I stumbled upon a couple of circular or other weird things, but I managed to solve all of those puzzles ;-)

Japanese emperors

edit

Hi. I noticed that you were fixing double redirects for Emperor Ninkō. Those redirects will actually be correct very shortly since all of the emperor articles are in the process of being retitled "Emperor X". Thanks. -Jefu 09:17, 17 September 2005 (UTC)Reply


I moved the Rub Hall entry to 'tent'. Is that better?

Beech King

edit

Hi. I noticed you removed the BE10 picture. I put up a new one that I took and is PD. For some reason though I'm not getting the little blurb under the picture. Any idea why? Is it a function of the box that it's in? Cheers

  • Do you mean the caption under the picture in the article? That's a function of the formatting when you insert the photo. For instance (without the brackets):

image:Brugge_Canel.jpg|300px|thumb|right| A pretty canal scene in Brugge taken on my Honeymoon 2005

The text about the canal scene goes to the right of the | character. You can see it used on my userpage. Let me know if this answers your question! Sorry about the hassle but there's a project that's clearing out unsourced images. Rx StrangeLove 23:53, 19 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

Copyvios

edit

Hi there. I've spent some time clearing out what I can of WP:CP lately, and you make some excellent catches. Can I just ask that you use the shiny new template for reporting them, as now in the instructions at the top of the page? It gives most of the important links I and others need to speed the drudgery of the process along. Thanks. -Splashtalk 17:17, 20 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

Sorry, I meant {{article-cv}} to be used when listing them at CP. {{copyvio}} is still to be used when blanking the article. -Splashtalk 17:56, 20 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

About TheFudge

edit

In the future, when nominating an article for speedy deletion, say that it does not assert notability rather than non-notable as non-notable is not a speedy deletion criteria (whereas does not assert notability is.) I hit an edit conflict, and I had already created the AfD page, so I decided to go through with it. I ended up looking at the Speedy Deletion criteria again, and the article probably fits it though... Sorry about that. — Ambush Commander(Talk) 20:33, 20 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

This one did meet the criteria pretty clearly, and I have just speedied it. By way of filling in Ambush's comment, we have a specific tag for nn-bio's: {{nn-bio}}, or, equivalently, {{db-bio}}.-Splashtalk 23:20, 20 September 2005 (UTC)Reply


 
Thanks

I want to thank you very much for your vote on my RFA. Greatly apperciated, I owe you one! Journalist | huh? 2 December 2024

Sudbury Airport, greater or lesser

edit

Ah, okay. Fair enough. I just went by how the airport promotes itself on its own website and the city's tourist marketing site. You'd think they'd be consistent... Bearcat 22:57, 27 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

Jeisa Chiminazzo...

edit

is still listed in Wikipedia:Copyright problems/Poster claims permission. They say on the talk page that they have communicated with you. From reading the comment at WP:CP, I do not think they have much chance of being able to give permission since someone else wrote the text. What was the communication with you? Can the copyvio notice be removed? -Splashtalk 01:26, 28 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

Fixed to Avoid Redirect

edit

I noticed that you have "fixed" a bunch of pages to avoid redirect. Taking for example pages that were: Pearson International Airport and making them Pearson International Airport. I don't think these kind of changes are a good idea. I understand that single redirects are considered acceptable and I think that it makes the readability of the source much less useful. Double redirects should be fixed, but they should be fixed at the redirect page. - Webgeer 20:19, 30 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the note, obviously what is done is done and fixing up locations where the incorrect name is used is always good. With regard to your note about speed, it isn't really relevant. It is all done on the server side, so the only thing is added is the single line of text where it says "Page redirected from..." One might argue that it slows down the server, but this would be an extremely small amount (were talking a few lines of code and one more database lookup to the dozens that are done when you load a page). I made the comment partly because I used to do the same type of changes (not very large scale, just when I noticed them). I've come to realize that having readable source is probably better. -- Webgeer 20:57, 30 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

I had to revert to the old links because I had asked that no one change the links in those articles because I wanted them to reflect the names of what it was when 9/11 happened. -- SNIyer12 17:19, 7 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

I put on the talk pages about comparing 9/11 with present, especially with Montreal-Dorval International Airport. When I mentioned the airport for the first time on that page (one of them being 9/11 timeline), I asked that no one change the name or link for Montreal-Dorval International Airport, even though it is now Montreal-Pierre Elliott Trudeau International Airport, because it was Dorval when 9/11 happened. -- SNIyer12 17:33, 7 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

==Who's RfA== Thank you for supporting my masters RfA. He appreciates your support and comments and looks forward to better serving Wikipedia the best he can. Of course I will be doing all of the real work. He would have responded to you directly, but he is currently out of town, and wanted to thank you asap. Thanks again. --Who's mop?¿? 20:58, 30 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

My RfA!

edit

My dear CambridgeBayWeather, I simply wanted to drop by now that my RfA is closed to give you a big THANK YOU! for your kind support. I hope that we continue to be in contact in the future, and you have in me a new friend. Hugs!   Shauri Yes babe? 19:18, 2 October 2005 (UTC)Reply


Maru's RfA

edit

Say, did I thank you for the vote? If not, consider yourself duly thanked! --Maru (talk) 01:01, 3 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

copyvios

edit

Well done for your ongoing work spotting copyvios. Two points:

-- RHaworth 11:07, 3 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

FA Premier League

edit

I know I've seen the phrase "The Greatest Show on Earth" on the Premier League web site but can't seem to find it anymore. Perhaps they're not using it anymore. --Howcheng 16:30, 3 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Gyrofrog RfA

edit

I just wanted to thank you for your vote of support in my request for adminship! -- Gyrofrog (talk) 05:15, 4 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Aircraft specs policy

edit

Several weeks ago, you voted in the WikiProject Aircraft Specifications Survey. One of the results of the survey was that the specifications for the various aircraft articles will now be displayed using a template. Ericg and I have just finished developing that template; a lengthier bulletin can be found on the WT:Air talkpage. Naturally, we will need to begin a drive to update the aircraft articles. However, several topics in the survey did reach establish consensus, and they need to be resolved before we implement the template. It is crticial that we make some conclusion, so that updating of the specs can resume as soon as possible. You can take part in the discussions here. Thanks, Ingoolemo talk 06:05, 4 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Expatriates

edit

Thanks for reversing the vandalism by 69.237.182.234. - which I've had to reverse again!

For his/her information, I don't hold anything against expatriates having been one myself - born in Kenya, brought up in Nigeria and educated in Singapore and the UK, where I have lived since 1989, not that has stopped me from travelling around the world and learning other languages.

However, I wouldn't use the term Third Culture Kid which is just silly, nor would I apply it to anyone else I know with a similar background to mine.

The references to former British expatriates as 'When I's and 'FILTH - Failed In London Try Hongkong' are not regarded as derogatory, and in any event they are now a bit dated now that the sun has set on the Empire and British citizens can no longer work in Hong Kong without visas.

Quiensabe 17:38 UTC 2005-10-04

Lets not have personal wars here!

edit

Ok Fine.. I took back the MuggleNet deletion. Happy? I say again, I have nothing against MuggleNet. I myself have been fan of MuggleNet for past 3 years! Anyways, I would like to be in contact with you. If you can, please reply in my user page. Rajdumbledore 13:26, 5 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

WP:CP

edit

Hi, you've reported copyright infringements to WP:CP in the last week, a new measure was recently passed to allow the speedy deltion of new pages that are cut and paste copyvios. Please follow these instructions if you come across this type of copyvio. Thanks. --nixie 00:11, 6 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Blatant copyright infringements may now be "speedied"

If an article and all its revisions are unquestionably copied from the website of a commercial content provider and there is no assertion of permission, ownership or fair use and none seems likely, and the article is less than 48 hours old, it may be speedily deleted. See CSD A8 for full conditions.

After notifying the uploading editor by using wording similar to:

{{nothanks-sd|pg=page name|url=url of source}} -- ~~~~

Blank the page and replace the text with

{{db-copyvio|url=url of source}}

to the article in question, leaving the content visible. An administrator will examine the article and decide whether to speedily delete it or not.

Contradictions - I'm not sure how the leave the content visible instruction made it onto that table- it was not a part of the proposal - I will investigate further. Whether people blank the article or just add the template dones't matter at this point- mostly I notified recent RC partollers to get them to start using the system, we'll fis the bugs as they arise.--nixie 02:16, 6 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Speedy delete

edit

Coo, I appreciate the heads up. Question... its late so I'm unsure what "getting caught the same way" is referring to; also I asked someone else, but I was wondering how long does one wait after putting a Speedy Delete header to actually delete the article? And if one chooses to delete it themselves, is there anything else that is necessary/customary? Such as a template explaining the deletion to the anon/author, and what steps they can take to undelete it? Thanks. - RoyBoy 800 05:57, 7 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Done and done... cheers, yeah I could use one right about now. - RoyBoy 800 06:17, 7 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

My RfA

edit

Thank you for your support on my RfA. Your trust in me is well appreciated. Owen× 21:44, 7 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your support of my RfA

edit

Dear CambridgeBayWeather: Thank you very much for your support on my RfA. I am most honoured by the trust that has been placed in me by yourself and other members of the Wikipedia community. I promise to only use my administrative privileges to assist the community in doing good work, and also to be calm, considerate and careful in working to make Wikipedia a better place. Although I do not believe we have met in person, I look forward to working with you on Wikipedia in the future. All the best, --NicholasTurnbull | (talk) (e-mail) (cabal) 01:21, 8 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

double vote

edit

Thanks for clearing up that I did not vote twice on that page and taking the time to comment on the talk page of the person who was new and made it look that way accidentally. Qaz (talk) 09:00, 8 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Statement requested for Arbitration

edit

I noticed you pointed out some edits that User:Lightbringer made that violated copyright or other Wikipedia policies, and that he summarily disagreed with you for no valid reason. There is currently an arbitration request regarding Freemasonry here. We were (until the article was locked) suffering the same sorts of unreferenced and/or copyright violating edits that you pointed out. Therefore, if you are so inclined, would you mind making a statement about those issues that you found on other articles? I think it illustrates a systematic problem that it may be beneficial for the arbitrators to be aware of. MSJapan 02:07, 9 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

My RFA

edit

I want to thank u for your time in voting in My RFA. I closed it early cause the result was obvious and im going to try again after a few months but your support vote means that Im starting to get respected in Wikipedia. Thank You again for your vote --JAranda | yeah 02:51, 9 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Well, since the last topic on your talk is exactly what I came here to do, I will just be a tagalong. Thanks muchly for your support!


Thanks on the RfA!

edit
 
Thanks For The Support!

Let me know how I can help once I become an admin! Karmafist 15:09, 9 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Template:Lists of airports by ICAO code

edit

You could add the breakouts that you have like AC, AB to the template. I don't think that would be the right thing to do. Maybe a second nav template could be built for this? I'm not sure how to do that and make it work with the main one. Take a look at Category:Schools established in the 20th century for some ideas on what might work.

BTW, could you add links for the ICAO codes? The project says that a redirect or DAB should exist for these. By adding the links, we would know which articles need to be added. Some of the IATA articles did that and some did not. With your work, maybe all of the ICAO pages will wind up with links. Vegaswikian 08:11, 11 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

I should have added, we will need this solution for the US mainland airports that start with K. Vegaswikian 08:14, 11 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Brain Teasers/Trivia:

edit

Hi, I'm just posting a friendly notice stating that I have got Brain Teasers/Trivia on my user page that you're welcome to have a go at. Will post new questions one day after they have been answered. Thanks... Spawn Man 09:34, 11 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your support on my RfA!

edit

  Thanks for your support of my adminship!! I was surprised at the turnout and support I got! If you ever have any issues with any of my actions, please notify me on my talk page! Thanks again! Ryan Norton T | @ | C 03:24, 13 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

edit

The link works, but only off of the Wikipedia:Requests for adminship mainpage for some reason...could be I uploaded the nomination wrong as I had a work Freestylefrappe's previous nomination during the upload.--MONGO 08:01, 13 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, it's doing the same thing for me now. Perhaps it was an upload error and if not I'll mention it in the talk page. Thanks for pointing that out!--MONGO 08:42, 13 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Buiteraptor

edit

Im afraid that there are not any yet! Todays newspapers should contain some information on the fossil...Otherwise little is known! Darkwinter123 09:55, 13 October 2005 (UTC)Reply


Yea go ahead and merge the two if you would like :) - no problem, glad the newspapers have finally put something up! Darkwinter123 12:37, 14 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

hi!

edit

umm im not sure if this is where this goes...

I'm not really a new member, I've been on wikipedia for a good two years, but had several accounts due to forgotten passwords :-)

The only thing I don't really now how to do is this, but I guess I've learned now! thanks! :-D

Oh, someone called RFiend deleted my article for Terry McCrann, a financial editor for a newspaper in Melbourne, Australia. He deleted it 'speedily'; it did not even last 4 hours! Anyway, point is, in this article I was attempting to get a photograph into one of those right-hand-side boxes. I tried copying the code from another article, but it had errors. Do you know the correct code?

Thanks,

Hunterd 11:41, 13 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

anon 206.116.115.69

edit

Can you check the edits from this IP on a few of the Canada airport pages? The ones being made to McCarran are not correct. I suspect this may be true for the others. BTW, how do the templates look for the ICAO and Canada airports look now that the changes appear to be done? I think that what we did look fine and works well. Vegaswikian 02:57, 14 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your help on the images. What page were you referring to in regards to the copyright image? ZPMMaker 12:36, 16 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

My RfA

edit

Thanks for your vote in my RfA. I'll do my best to live up to the wiki standards and be a good admin!

--Sebastian Kessel Talk 15:22, 14 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

My RfA

edit

Thank you so much for the support! I will try to keep your Wikipedia presence warm up there in that cold Arctic climate.  Denelson83  21:58, 14 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

More RFA thanks...

edit

Thank you for supporting me. I'll try to only do a little bit of evil.  :) Wikibofh 00:15, 15 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

help!

edit

Sorry to bug you. I'm the new user who you sent some useful links to a few days ago so I could use proper style. I have a new problem....I changed skins in my preferences, and cannot get back to the default skin. Do you have any ideas how to fix this? (I'm about to try firefox to see if my problem is browser-related.) Evenprime 04:55, 15 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Never mind. I was able to fix it with mozilla. IE is evil. Evenprime 05:05, 15 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Adville

edit

Does this article DSL_around_the_world seem to you to be creeping into adville or what? I just want to do a reality check cuz it seems like either a guide to services which we are not or a collection of ad pages. I am tired right now so I wanted more input Qaz (talk) 13:41, 15 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

re:Williamsberg

edit

Okay...it wasn't the incorrect spelling essentially...it was the lack of info and the duplication of an existing article...redirect works though.--MONGO 14:05, 15 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

RFA

edit

Please delete the him/her in my description as appropriate!

Martin 14:12, 15 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Hi, thanks for accepting, this page says you (as opposed to me) have to add it to the rfa page, I would have done it but I wasn't sure if you had deliberately not added it yet because you wanted to add more to your answers or something. thanks and good luck. Martin 10:46, 16 October 2005 (UTC)Reply
You just needed to add {{Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/CambridgeBayWeather}} ---- to the main page, the whole process is a bit confusing, but I've done it now. Martin 11:14, 16 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

RFA Thanks

edit
 
Thank you for your support on my RfA. ≈ jossi fresco ≈ t@ 15:05, 15 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Celestianpower is an admin

edit

Thank you very much for your support - my bid (as you probably know) went swimmingly. I couldn't have asked for a better one. Thank you very much and I just hope I don't mess up! Surprisingly enough, I have seen you aout and always liked what I have seen. Good luck in future exploits! --Celestianpower hablamé 12:44, 16 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

FSF RFA

edit

Thanks for your support. freestylefrappe 15:37, 16 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Arbitration accepted

edit

Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Lightbringer has been accepted. Please place any evidence at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Lightbringer/Evidence Fred Bauder 01:55, 17 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Thank you

edit

I just wanted to say thank you for your support of my admin nomination. I look forward to the time when our Wikipedia paths cross once again. —Wayward Talk 04:55, 18 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

My RfA

edit

Thanks for supporting my RfA. I will use my new powers wisely! --Wikiacc (talk) 19:11, 18 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Hermione1980's RfA

edit

Thank you for your support on my RfA; I really appreciate it! I will do my best to live up to the trust you've shown in me. Thanks, Hermione1980 23:06, 18 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

My RfA

edit
 

Thanks, CambridgeBayWeather, for your support of my RfA! I promise to do a good job using the keys to the janitor's closet. >: Roby Wayne Talk • Hist • E@ 01:42, 19 October 2005 (UTC)Reply


Cyberjunkie's RfA

edit

Hi CambridgeBayWeather. Just wanted to thank you for supporting my RfA. I hope I will be able to live up to the confidence placed in me. --Cyberjunkie | Talk 03:57, 19 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Thanks

edit

Cambridge - Thanks for your support on my recent RfA. I hope that I can live up to everyone's expectations. If you ever need anything, please send me a message. --best, kevin ···Kzollman | Talk··· 05:26, 20 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Thanks

edit

CBW, thanks for your support on my RFA. I very much appreciate it. If you ever need anything, don't hesitate to ask. See you around! thames 18:24, 20 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

From a new admin

edit

Thank you for your interest in candidates on RfA, and in my recent candidacy. Even though I don't think we've worked together on an article before, it's good to meet you. The sysop buttons look all very shiny at the moment, but I beleive that cooperation is the greatest tool. So, let me know if you could do with some collaboration in the future. Thanks. --Gareth Hughes 10:16, 21 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Thank You

edit

Thank you for your support in my recent request for adminship. It was successful thanks to you. I will strive to an open, approachable and transparent administrator. --Jcw69 17:50, 21 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

You're a sysop!

edit
Hi, CambridgeBayWeather/Archive01, Congratulations on Becoming a Sysop
 

Hey there. I'm pleased to let you know that, consensus being reached, you are now an administrator! You've volunteered to do housekeeping duties that normal users sadly cannot participate in. Sysops can't do a lot of stuff: They can't delete pages just like that (except patent nonsense like "aojt9085yu8;3ou"), and they can't protect pages in an edit war they are involved in. But they can delete random junk, ban anonymous vandals, delete pages listed on Votes for deletion (provided there's a consensus) for more than one week, protect pages when asked to, and keep the few protected pages that exist on Wikipedia up to date.

Almost anything you can do can be undone, but please take a look at The Administrators' how-to guide and the Administrators' reading list before you get started (although you should have read that during your candidacy ;). Take a look before experimenting with your powers. Also, please add Administrators' noticeboard to your watchlist, as there are always discussions/requests for admins there. If you have any questions drop me a message at My talk page. Have fun! =Nichalp «Talk»=

Please also add your name to WP:LA. =Nichalp «Talk»= 07:01, 23 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Congrats on adminship Dlyons493 Talk 12:41, 23 October 2005 (UTC)Reply
Congratulations! Well deserved. Owen× 21:40, 23 October 2005 (UTC)Reply
Congrats from me too - and no trouble with the support - you'll do fine. Grutness...wha? 00:28, 24 October 2005 (UTC)Reply
Congratulations, and you're quite welcome. I know you'll do a great job. (I had thought you were aleady an admin!) --Merovingian (t) (c) (e) 00:40, 24 October 2005 (UTC)Reply
Ditto, ditto. Youre quite welcome. I'm sure I wont have any concerns about your actions. Banes 05:38, 24 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Getting logged out

edit

Hi, I was just surfing past your user page and noticed the bit about getting logged out. I too suffer the same problem (it's ~1 min of inactivity for me). I've found that clicking "Remember Me" when logging in (make sure cookies are enabled) solves this problem. It might be worth a try, even if it's an undesirable workaround. -Lommer | talk 06:24, 24 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

I think you are correct on checking the "Remember Me", as at home I have it checked and there seems to be no problem with the logging out. The rest of the time I'm at work and I really don't want to leave my password enabled there, as there are a couple of people who might abuse it because they would think it funny. I could clear everything after I finished but I would get busy and forget (as my supervisor does with his bank account, etc). The strange thing is that getting logged out is really random. Yesterday I had a two hour gap between edits and didn't get logged out. Yet the other day I got logged out even though I was editing. Sometimes the logging out occurs when clicking on a link and then hitting the back button logs back in. The worst was when I had to shut the browser down and start again. This makes me wonder if it's a browser created problem. What ar you using? I'm using Maxthon which is an IE based browser so I should give Firefox a try. CambridgeBayWeather 14:15, 24 October 2005 (UTC)Reply
I dunno - I'm using firefox 1.0.7. And my symptoms are in full agreeance with the randomness observation. The only thing I find is that If I'm getting logged out spontaneously, it happens repeatedly for some time (sometimes as long as a couple hours) and then I'll go for a day or two without it happening. This leads me to believe its a wikimedia server-side problem or something to do with general net traffic or settings. However, I know enough to know that I don't know much about this kind of stuff and all that is pure speculation. I haven't tried using other browsers yet, I'll give that a shot next time it happens. -Lommer | talk 21:07, 24 October 2005 (UTC)Reply
At home and followed a link from a user page with a right click and was logged out. Then clicked on a link from that pge and was logged back in again. Strage. CambridgeBayWeather 21:43, 24 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Your Rfa

edit
The comment was in opposition to Boothy's oppose. I didn't make the full text as I had done so on other RfA's, I just posted the picture. You're welcome to draw your own conclusions as the wisdom of that action :-) . Ëvilphoenix Burn! 23:26, 24 October 2005 (UTC)Reply