Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 28)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The comment left by ScottishFinnishRadish was: This is not any sort of encyclopedic topic.
ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:57, 28 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Cambridge Guys! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 23:57, 28 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

November 2022

edit

  Hello, I'm Aaron Liu. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Natalia Dyer, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Aaron Liu (talk) 12:54, 7 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Can You Feel It (The Jacksons song), you may be blocked from editing. If you're expecting me to do what I did with "Hip to Hip", you're wrong. It's your responsibility to cite the information you add. I'm suspecting you and Sandiners are related somehow. ResPM (T🔈🎵C) 12:24, 15 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Christopher Richard "Richie" Stringini moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for creating Christopher Richard "Richie" Stringini. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability and IMDB is not a reliable source, articles needs multiple reliable sources with in-depth coverage. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. MB 14:49, 10 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

License tagging for File:Richie Stringini.jpg

edit

Thanks for uploading File:Richie Stringini.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 15:30, 10 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Rhythm of Life (Shake It Down) moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Rhythm of Life (Shake It Down), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster talk 19:16, 10 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Blocked for sockpuppetry

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cambridge Guys. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  --Blablubbs (talk) 18:16, 17 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Blocked for sockpuppetry

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Cambridge Guys. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 19:47, 28 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding User:Cambridge Guys/sandbox

edit

  Hello, Cambridge Guys. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Cambridge Guys/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:02, 31 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of User:Cambridge Guys/sandbox

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. The page User:Cambridge Guys/sandbox has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Liz Read! Talk! 22:52, 28 April 2023 (UTC)Reply