Cambridge tide

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Ellis (American physicist) (March 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John Ellis (American physicist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:John Ellis (American physicist), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 07:36, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

Hello, Cambridge tide! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 07:36, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Ellis (American physicist) (April 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by StarryGrandma was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John Ellis (American physicist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:John Ellis (American physicist), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

StarryGrandma (talk) 01:59, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

Eugene Terentjev

I can only read the first part of your message - presumably regarding my edits in November 2017. Would you like to expand here, please. - Derek R Bullamore (talk) 13:16, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Hi Derek, Thanks for your prompt reply, here is a copy of the original message:

I noticed that you edited a page for Eugene Terentjev, he is a Cambridge Director of Studies at Queens College.

I am trying to get a page submitted for Dr John Ellis who is also a Cambridge Director of Studies, but at Gonville and Caius College.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:John_Ellis_(British_physicist)

I was wondering if you could give me some advice for getting this submission accepted, Kind Regards C

I am a long way from my comfort zone on this type of subject matter. In addition, I have never operated in the WP:AfC arena, as I do not feel particularly at ease dealing with other editors draft articles. There are three pieces of advice I would give. Firstly, if you have not already done so, contact those editors who have corresponded with you on this draft, and ask specific questions as to how the draft needs to be enhanced to meet the eligibility criteria. Secondly, have a read of some of the blue links in the standard replies you have had - specifically WP:NPROF and ask yourself if you can see why the subject matter is falling short. Finally, often it is a lack of reliable third party references that is the stumbling block. In other words, has John Ellis had coverage in publications outside those having a close affiliation to the subject matter ? Note that not everyone is deemed notable ! I hope this helps.

Derek R Bullamore (talk) 14:56, 10 April 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Ellis (British physicist) has been accepted

John Ellis (British physicist), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 03:58, 12 May 2020 (UTC)