Holy Grail Layout

edit

Hello! Thanks for your interest in this article. I'm the creator and main protagonist of the article (anonymous edits by IP's starting with 173. & 69. are mine also), and I've been trying to turn it into the article I wish I had when I got started in design. It's been my main contribution to Wikipedia, and at one point I hoped to make it good enough to be a featured article. I don't think that will happen, as the article has a limited lifespan, with the problem going away because of CSS3.

I thought that the article was fairly well organized before, but you have brought that into question. I'm not so egotistical or uncooperative as to just undo your edits, but I think I need to think about what you've done before working on the article again.

One thing that I will challenge is that what many you have labeled as "Old Solutions" are still in common use, at least as fallbacks due to lack of browser adoption (I'm a late adopter myself). But perhaps separating out the obsolete is desirable.

At any rate, I think that this article may be proposed for deletion in a couple of years with CSS3 taking over. In the meantime, I think the part of the article that needs the most work is the History section.

I don't have time to dig into this tonight, as I've got a website to crank out. Further discussion should probably happen on the article's talk page. Talk to you soon. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidlark (talkcontribs) 07:07, 28 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

March 2015

edit

  Hello, I'm SMC. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Krav Maga, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. SMC (talk) 22:05, 26 March 2015 (UTC)Reply