Canstusdis

Welcome to Wikipedia

Welcome!

Hello, Canstusdis, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! tedder (talk) 05:15, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Patrick Willis

Your edit summary on Patrick Willis called my edit "vandalism". Please remember to assume good faith on Wikipedia. I was not intending to vandalize the article. I was trying to avoid weasel words. Calling edits that are not vandalism, vandalism, is not helpful. Kansan (talk) 07:43, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. Canstusdis (talk) 06:47, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

RE:Annihilationism

Link MobileSnail 03:04, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks again. --Canstusdis (talk) 03:51, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Opposing Texts on Annihilationism

Your continual removal of any annihilationist response to the list of opposing texts on annihilationism is unjustified and unfair. Considering that this is a Wikipedia page on annihilationism and that there are traditionalists responses to many of the sections on this page, it is fair and only appropriate that annihilationists have an opportunity to respond to the traditionalist position. Considering that some readers may immediately skip to this section, it is reasonable to have the annihilationist position on these texts briefly mentioned. Sven.ostring (talk) 00:45, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Friend, this is a wikipedia page, not a justification for your position on annihilationism. Please follow the WP:NPOV and WP:REF guidelines. Thanks. ---Canstusdis (talk) 01:11, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	for offer of proofreading after Notzrim redirect is sorted out, will take you up on it. Cheers In ictu oculi (talk) 02:36, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. I will be happy to assist. ---Canstusdis (talk) 12:17, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Necromancy – Dispute Resolution

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Necromancy". Thank you. — Apo-kalypso (talk) 05:06, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks. Link to discussion ---Canstusdis (talk) 17:55, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

WP:LEAD and good article status

I'll start a discussion on Talk:Hermann Fegelein. Thanks. Canstusdis

Note about edit warring; BRD

Discussed at Talk:Joseph Smith. Thanks. Canstusdis (talk) 01:26, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Notice

In case you didn't get the notification, there's a thread about you at WP:AN/I here. ~Adjwilley (talk) 22:20, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

With this edit you changed the text of a comment another editor had left on your talk page. This seems to be mischievous and could lead to a block. You pretend that a person said something that he or she didn't say. EdJohnston (talk) 01:00, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

C'mon, look at the date. I could have easily removed it, but the advice he gave me back then was good. I guess now I'll have to remove the whole thing. Thanks for your understanding. Canstusdis (talk) 02:31, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

I have added incident that EdJohnston pointed out to the Incidents board, as I disagree with the marginalization of my comments being edited like that. Additionally, per Talk Page Guidelines, archiving threads, not deleting them, is the preferred method. While it may be permitted to delete them, but it isn't the preferred method.--ARTEST4ECHO (^talk/_contribs) 13:53, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--ARTEST4ECHO (^talk/_contribs) 12:58, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

After I notified you, I noticed that User Adjwilley had already started an "Incidents" noticeboard page, here on this issue. So the one I made is redundant. I have moved my comments to that page. My apologies.--ARTEST4ECHO (^talk/_contribs) 13:40, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

September 2013

You have been blocked for 24 hours for edit warring at Joseph Smith. I am also concerned about some disruption on article talkpages and even on your own talkpage.[1] Please listen to advice, and take the opportunity to read WP:BATTLE while you're blocked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen | talk 13:50, 11 September 2013 (UTC).

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)